Is Romeo a boy or girl name?
Romeo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 1,188 boys were named Romeo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 25,728 US babies named Romeo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #283
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Romeo since 1880
- 25,728
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 1,188 babies
Boys and girls named Romeo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 66 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 137 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 800 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 996 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 630 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 475 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 450 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 503 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 604 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 746 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,501 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 4,475 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 9,227 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 5,110 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,188 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 1,132 | #292 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 1,045 | #323 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 927 | #350 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 818 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 971 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 981 | #342 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 924 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 908 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 851 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 972 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 955 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 980 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 835 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 850 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 718 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 596 | #464 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 528 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 436 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 369 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 356 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 322 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 388 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 444 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 318 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 247 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 307 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 265 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 130 | #976 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 103 | #1,130 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 87 | #1,253 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 98 | #1,140 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 75 | #1,306 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 83 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 106 | #1,033 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 99 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 95 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 84 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 68 | #1,150 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 90 | #966 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 65 | #1,130 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 52 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 69 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 51 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 73 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 62 | #1,152 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 52 | #1,253 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 57 | #1,174 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 56 | #1,151 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 54 | #1,157 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 75 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 64 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 58 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 54 | #1,124 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 72 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 56 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 48 | #1,079 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 51 | #1,029 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 44 | #1,126 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 42 | #1,185 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 46 | #1,144 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 59 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 65 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 49 | #1,129 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 43 | #1,206 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 38 | #1,278 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 44 | #1,168 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 40 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 53 | #1,043 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 49 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 51 | #1,053 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 52 | #1,013 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 42 | #1,148 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 33 | #1,293 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 48 | #1,018 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 50 | #995 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 51 | #986 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 62 | #888 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 42 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 35 | #1,117 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 42 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 47 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 47 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 50 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 49 | #916 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 41 | #1,005 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 64 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 60 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 50 | #868 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 70 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 58 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 59 | #809 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 62 | #814 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 65 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 101 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 92 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 94 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 70 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 95 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 102 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 114 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 112 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 105 | #632 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 108 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 104 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 111 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 115 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 115 | #548 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 118 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 95 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 83 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 58 | #577 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 48 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 34 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 23 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 19 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 21 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 16 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 13 | #700 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #907 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 14 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 16 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 13 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 8 | #844 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 8 | #844 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 14 | #601 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 8 | #841 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 6 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 7 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 5 | #1,156 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 11 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 7 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 8 | #734 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Romeo reached #283 in 2024. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Romeo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.