Is Stafford a boy or girl name?
Stafford is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 14 boys were named Stafford, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,822 US babies named Stafford were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #6,401
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Stafford since 1882
- 2,822
- Most popular year
- 1959
- 53 babies
Boys and girls named Stafford, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 18 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 31 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 244 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 295 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 248 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 305 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 419 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 398 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 213 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 188 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 168 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 92 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 131 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 72 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14 | #6,401 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 12 | #7,235 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 18 | #5,403 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 14 | #6,301 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 14 | #6,245 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 11 | #7,564 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 16 | #5,743 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 14 | #6,293 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 12 | #7,083 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 14 | #6,265 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,482 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 20 | #4,775 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 12 | #6,977 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 11 | #7,433 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 10 | #8,052 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 5 | #14,207 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 14 | #6,352 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 10 | #8,079 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 12 | #6,848 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 11 | #6,915 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 8 | #8,518 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 5 | #12,242 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 10 | #6,867 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 17 | #4,536 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 8 | #7,773 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 13 | #5,123 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 15 | #4,422 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 16 | #4,162 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 18 | #3,673 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 20 | #3,449 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 15 | #4,188 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 20 | #3,319 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 24 | #2,818 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 19 | #3,293 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 15 | #3,784 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 29 | #2,187 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 26 | #2,264 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 14 | #3,419 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 18 | #2,811 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 21 | #2,429 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 19 | #2,562 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 16 | #2,959 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 18 | #2,667 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 12 | #3,587 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 17 | #2,762 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 14 | #3,051 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 16 | #2,769 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 16 | #2,691 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 28 | #1,778 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 17 | #2,444 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 20 | #2,112 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 18 | #2,232 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 25 | #1,820 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 42 | #1,294 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 46 | #1,165 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 25 | #1,610 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 27 | #1,503 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 43 | #1,145 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 42 | #1,187 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 48 | #1,110 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 37 | #1,302 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 41 | #1,226 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 46 | #1,174 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 43 | #1,207 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 53 | #1,067 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 33 | #1,368 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 42 | #1,213 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 50 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 32 | #1,365 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 44 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 40 | #1,186 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 42 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 41 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 42 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 37 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 44 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 33 | #1,293 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 29 | #1,326 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 28 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 31 | #1,207 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 25 | #1,429 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 41 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 18 | #1,683 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 19 | #1,620 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 26 | #1,320 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 18 | #1,681 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 26 | #1,341 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 12 | #2,164 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 42 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 18 | #1,720 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 25 | #1,358 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 27 | #1,353 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 26 | #1,387 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 28 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 27 | #1,408 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 22 | #1,640 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 28 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 28 | #1,401 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 31 | #1,328 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 29 | #1,410 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 30 | #1,357 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 30 | #1,364 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 35 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 35 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 39 | #1,118 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 43 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 30 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 29 | #1,261 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 21 | #1,548 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 20 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 22 | #1,105 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 21 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 9 | #1,280 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,109 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 7 | #1,188 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,218 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 6 | #1,117 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,296 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 7 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 6 | #961 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 7 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 5 | #1,077 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Stafford reached #837 in 1884. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Stafford
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.