Is Tomas a boy or girl name?
Tomas is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 355 boys were named Tomas, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 30,335 US babies named Tomas were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #734
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Tomas since 1880
- 30,335
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 537 babies
Boys and girls named Tomas, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 152 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 122 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 196 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 622 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,430 | 6 | 0.4% |
| 1930s | 1,331 | 5 | 0.4% |
| 1940s | 1,600 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,899 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 2,071 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 2,614 | 6 | 0.2% |
| 1980s | 3,318 | 5 | 0.2% |
| 1990s | 4,515 | 5 | 0.1% |
| 2000s | 5,030 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 3,603 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 1,805 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 355 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 367 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 385 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 343 | #744 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 355 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 373 | #687 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 341 | #712 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 352 | #701 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 345 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 342 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 390 | #659 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 347 | #692 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 358 | #661 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 370 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 385 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 461 | #574 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 475 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 489 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 535 | #487 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 509 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 515 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 537 | #468 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 523 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 492 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 494 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 453 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 495 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 456 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 510 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 464 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 462 | #470 | 5 | #15,613 |
| 1993 | 421 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 435 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 426 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 393 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 368 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 352 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 314 | #506 | 5 | #13,137 |
| 1986 | 330 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 325 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 339 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 297 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 302 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 332 | #456 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 359 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 263 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 269 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 281 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 285 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 264 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 266 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 250 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 254 | #496 | 6 | #8,206 |
| 1971 | 232 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 250 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 208 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 226 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 202 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 220 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 192 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 196 | #566 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 200 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 225 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 199 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 203 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 194 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 212 | #530 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 200 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 184 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 194 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 171 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 188 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 207 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 174 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 175 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 199 | #468 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 174 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 188 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 173 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 163 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 146 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 157 | #494 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 142 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 147 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 111 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 110 | #549 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 154 | #467 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 123 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 144 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 135 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 145 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 119 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 130 | #507 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 114 | #549 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 157 | #475 | 5 | #5,187 |
| 1929 | 139 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 159 | #484 | 6 | #4,680 |
| 1927 | 158 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 149 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 147 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 143 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 159 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 141 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 121 | #575 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 114 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 93 | #632 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 89 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 69 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 78 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 63 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 62 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 50 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 55 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 20 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 43 | #412 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 27 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 18 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 29 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 17 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 18 | #568 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 21 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 16 | #574 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 19 | #504 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 15 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 16 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 17 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 14 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 11 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 19 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 6 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 10 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 8 | #830 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 15 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #952 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 16 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 9 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 15 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 7 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 20 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 17 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 18 | #447 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 13 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 17 | #449 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 18 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 18 | #423 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Tomas reached #402 in 1886. As a girl name, it reached #4,680 in 1928. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Tomas
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.