Is Vida a boy or girl name?
Vida is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 246 girls and 0 boys were named Vida, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.7% of the 12,285 US babies named Vida were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,023
- Babies named Vida since 1880
- 12,285
- Most popular year
- 2022
- 277 babies
Boys and girls named Vida, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 307 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 641 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 808 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,564 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,812 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 998 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 647 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 745 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 640 | 100% |
| 1970s | 38 | 307 | 89% |
| 1980s | 0 | 215 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 200 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 542 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,630 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,191 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 246 | #1,023 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 230 | #1,078 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 277 | #964 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 261 | #991 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 177 | #1,270 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 192 | #1,225 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 168 | #1,345 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 162 | #1,415 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,543 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 187 | #1,292 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 177 | #1,339 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 179 | #1,316 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,590 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,591 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 145 | #1,544 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 100 | #2,062 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,417 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 85 | #2,290 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,350 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,932 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,263 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,936 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,892 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,357 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,786 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,084 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,058 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,504 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,731 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,213 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,594 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,198 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,303 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,242 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,519 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,149 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,835 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,422 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,535 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,634 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,719 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,691 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,015 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,854 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,535 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,073 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,095 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,174 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,185 |
| 1975 | 5 | #6,307 | 29 | #2,679 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,916 |
| 1973 | 10 | #3,438 | 35 | #2,266 |
| 1972 | 15 | #2,529 | 36 | #2,171 |
| 1971 | 8 | #3,951 | 50 | #1,802 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,520 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,582 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,202 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,731 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,447 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,405 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,209 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,179 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,330 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,167 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,187 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,243 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,220 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,152 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,236 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,185 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,133 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,077 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,075 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,302 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,063 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,120 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,311 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,126 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 81 | #930 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,031 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 69 | #936 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 78 | #888 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,075 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 71 | #870 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 57 | #956 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 66 | #866 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 78 | #802 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 94 | #709 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 78 | #767 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 97 | #678 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 116 | #616 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 106 | #641 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 100 | #677 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 129 | #583 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 134 | #596 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 159 | #544 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 164 | #544 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 159 | #564 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 156 | #571 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 188 | #515 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 164 | #573 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 182 | #523 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 220 | #463 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 200 | #495 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 220 | #458 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 191 | #484 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 220 | #450 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 193 | #467 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 193 | #460 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 187 | #450 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 166 | #413 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 135 | #426 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 113 | #443 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 101 | #401 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 65 | #512 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 83 | #403 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 74 | #421 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 78 | #403 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 76 | #396 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 89 | #356 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 77 | #376 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 95 | #320 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 71 | #377 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 84 | #336 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 81 | #374 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 65 | #365 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 74 | #366 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 72 | #347 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 80 | #325 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 78 | #324 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 56 | #376 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 57 | #358 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 53 | #369 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 61 | #322 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 45 | #377 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 45 | #361 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 52 | #336 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 40 | #343 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 43 | #324 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 25 | #426 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 32 | #357 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 22 | #410 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 21 | #404 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 14 | #469 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 13 | #490 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Vida reached #2,529 in 1972. As a girl name, it reached #320 in 1903. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Vida
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.