Is Zebulon a boy or girl name?
Zebulon is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 24 boys were named Zebulon, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,129 US babies named Zebulon were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,411
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Zebulon since 1891
- 2,129
- Most popular year
- 1979
- 125 babies
Boys and girls named Zebulon, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 19 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 19 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 18 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 341 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 610 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 416 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 281 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 272 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 117 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | #4,411 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 19 | #5,245 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 19 | #5,209 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 29 | #3,812 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 26 | #4,017 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 27 | #4,000 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 22 | #4,607 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 29 | #3,778 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 24 | #4,323 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 36 | #3,227 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 28 | #3,785 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 30 | #3,581 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 19 | #5,034 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 25 | #4,107 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 32 | #3,450 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 24 | #4,276 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 23 | #4,392 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 19 | #4,993 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 28 | #3,685 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 22 | #4,195 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 19 | #4,601 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 29 | #3,278 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 29 | #3,187 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 38 | #2,560 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 50 | #2,047 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 34 | #2,607 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 35 | #2,506 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 43 | #2,094 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 41 | #2,113 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 45 | #1,913 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 46 | #1,867 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 43 | #1,932 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 45 | #1,841 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 39 | #1,981 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 45 | #1,779 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 45 | #1,732 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 52 | #1,481 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 42 | #1,654 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 45 | #1,510 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 53 | #1,332 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 83 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 46 | #1,398 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 72 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 80 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 92 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 125 | #776 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 92 | #900 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 39 | #1,489 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 29 | #1,779 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,946 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 7 | #4,632 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 6 | #5,097 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 7 | #4,434 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 6 | #4,905 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,431 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 7 | #3,935 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 9 | #3,042 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,571 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 5 | #4,197 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 5 | #4,017 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 8 | #2,938 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 9 | #2,863 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 6 | #4,147 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 7 | #3,868 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 6 | #4,282 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,599 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 7 | #3,512 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,913 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #961 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Zebulon reached #776 in 1979. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.