Is Abram a boy or girl name?
Abram is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 374 boys were named Abram, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 19,890 US babies named Abram were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #710
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Abram since 1880
- 19,890
- Most popular year
- 2016
- 864 babies
Boys and girls named Abram, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 228 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 181 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 512 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 504 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 383 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 353 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 379 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 333 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 929 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,449 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,470 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 3,600 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 7,252 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,169 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 374 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 373 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 434 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 478 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 510 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 609 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 699 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 744 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 864 | #379 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 839 | #383 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 833 | #377 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 807 | #375 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 755 | #393 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 614 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 488 | #530 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 554 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 478 | #550 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 463 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 414 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 433 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 378 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 263 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 197 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 215 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 205 | #793 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 183 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 151 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 162 | #866 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 156 | #879 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 161 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 161 | #844 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 129 | #945 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 109 | #1,049 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 133 | #909 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 125 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 126 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 131 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 134 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 155 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 151 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 137 | #742 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 150 | #698 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 179 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 136 | #746 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 150 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 147 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 150 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 114 | #803 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 129 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 98 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 82 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 70 | #962 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 51 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 46 | #1,214 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 42 | #1,278 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 41 | #1,231 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 38 | #1,233 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 38 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 34 | #1,299 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 26 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 26 | #1,545 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 38 | #1,254 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 29 | #1,454 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 29 | #1,493 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 34 | #1,359 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 28 | #1,501 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 40 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 52 | #1,050 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 46 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 35 | #1,273 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 33 | #1,311 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 33 | #1,304 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 35 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 40 | #1,139 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 37 | #1,181 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 44 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 41 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 42 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 32 | #1,236 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 38 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 40 | #1,038 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 30 | #1,258 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 34 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 29 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 23 | #1,397 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 31 | #1,169 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 37 | #1,062 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 31 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 32 | #1,168 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 45 | #940 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 38 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 33 | #1,144 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 48 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 50 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 38 | #1,132 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 55 | #900 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 49 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 51 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 52 | #944 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 50 | #956 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 47 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 48 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 50 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 49 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 53 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 59 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 59 | #855 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 57 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 58 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 81 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 63 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 52 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 36 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 21 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 26 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 24 | #530 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 17 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 18 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 16 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 17 | #538 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 11 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 9 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 8 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 18 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 13 | #548 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 17 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 19 | #438 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 19 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 18 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 19 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 14 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 25 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 18 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 19 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 23 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 26 | #359 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 19 | #377 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 18 | #418 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 17 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 29 | #325 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 20 | #381 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 25 | #355 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 30 | #290 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 21 | #373 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Abram reached #290 in 1881. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Abram
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.