Is Aram a boy or girl name?
Aram is mostly a boy name in the US. In 2024, 6 girls and 105 boys were named Aram, so 5.4% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1.7% of the 3,274 US babies named Aram were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,613
- Girl rank, 2024
- #13,599
- Babies named Aram since 1912
- 3,274
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 111 babies
Boys and girls named Aram, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 82 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 169 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 88 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 40 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 91 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 158 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 258 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 326 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 400 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 522 | 17 | 3.2% |
| 2010s | 656 | 27 | 4% |
| 2020s | 429 | 11 | 2.5% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 105 | #1,613 | 6 | #13,599 |
| 2023 | 100 | #1,694 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 77 | #1,982 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 75 | #1,982 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 72 | #1,977 | 5 | #15,329 |
| 2019 | 101 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 64 | #2,170 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 89 | #1,736 | 6 | #14,320 |
| 2016 | 75 | #1,939 | 6 | #14,524 |
| 2015 | 66 | #2,112 | 5 | #16,693 |
| 2014 | 59 | #2,256 | 5 | #16,812 |
| 2013 | 56 | #2,281 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 55 | #2,327 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 48 | #2,547 | 5 | #17,042 |
| 2010 | 43 | #2,790 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 48 | #2,586 | 5 | #17,593 |
| 2008 | 41 | #2,882 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 63 | #2,140 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 54 | #2,314 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 54 | #2,207 | 7 | #13,175 |
| 2004 | 59 | #2,024 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 47 | #2,275 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 54 | #2,019 | 5 | #15,672 |
| 2001 | 53 | #2,007 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 49 | #2,049 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 47 | #2,027 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 41 | #2,205 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 49 | #1,891 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 41 | #2,073 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 44 | #1,918 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 44 | #1,894 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 38 | #2,092 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 36 | #2,129 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 30 | #2,347 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 30 | #2,315 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 34 | #2,067 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 31 | #2,035 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 29 | #2,058 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 31 | #1,921 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 39 | #1,616 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 42 | #1,483 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 27 | #1,958 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 31 | #1,814 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 31 | #1,813 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 31 | #1,809 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 40 | #1,488 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 33 | #1,654 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 23 | #2,066 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 24 | #2,003 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 18 | #2,365 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 15 | #2,553 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 34 | #1,464 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 26 | #1,729 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 20 | #2,057 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 25 | #1,746 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 30 | #1,465 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 16 | #2,034 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 14 | #2,144 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 16 | #1,969 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 14 | #2,181 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 14 | #2,213 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 15 | #2,116 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 11 | #2,511 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 16 | #2,069 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 12 | #2,426 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 10 | #2,670 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 20 | #1,770 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 9 | #2,833 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 7 | #3,231 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 7 | #3,212 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 8 | #2,956 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 9 | #2,715 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 5 | #3,759 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 8 | #2,853 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 8 | #2,779 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 6 | #3,316 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 5 | #3,545 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 8 | #2,637 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 5 | #3,564 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 9 | #2,534 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 7 | #2,888 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 7 | #2,843 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 11 | #2,207 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,164 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 11 | #2,251 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 5 | #3,698 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,019 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 16 | #1,851 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 10 | #2,479 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 15 | #1,966 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 20 | #1,674 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 18 | #1,826 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 11 | #2,529 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 14 | #2,195 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 11 | #2,602 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 19 | #1,843 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 24 | #1,553 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 28 | #1,397 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 16 | #2,065 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 8 | #3,224 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 11 | #2,516 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 19 | #1,697 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 12 | #2,268 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 19 | #1,604 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 9 | #2,279 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 7 | #2,288 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,561 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Aram reached #1,397 in 1922. As a girl name, it reached #13,175 in 2005. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Aram
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.