Is Arabelle a boy or girl name?
Arabelle is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 89 girls and 0 boys were named Arabelle, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,178 US babies named Arabelle were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,130
- Babies named Arabelle since 1893
- 2,178
- Most popular year
- 2017
- 146 babies
Boys and girls named Arabelle, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 23 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 28 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 130 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 124 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 40 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1990s | 0 | 30 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 245 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,081 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 472 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 89 | #2,130 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,738 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 91 | #2,105 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,365 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,945 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,013 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,747 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,514 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,713 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 133 | #1,610 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,577 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,816 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,082 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,642 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,940 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,418 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 39 | #4,017 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,141 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,269 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,716 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,251 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,612 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,330 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,182 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,249 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,861 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,053 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 9 | #8,875 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,395 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,866 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,218 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,120 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,916 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,511 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,361 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,078 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,780 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,575 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,333 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,786 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,671 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,472 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,836 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,202 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,361 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,159 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,382 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,657 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,034 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,391 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,605 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,892 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,852 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,339 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,548 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,499 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,608 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,444 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,406 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,602 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,362 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,284 |
Highest rank
Arabelle has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,284 in 1893. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Arabelle
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.