Is Arabella a boy or girl name?
Arabella is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 1,476 girls and 0 boys were named Arabella, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 26,512 US babies named Arabella were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #206
- Babies named Arabella since 1881
- 26,512
- Most popular year
- 2014
- 1,912 babies
Boys and girls named Arabella, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 48 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 85 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 167 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 166 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 95 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 72 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 69 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 52 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 305 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 3,107 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 15,114 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 7,063 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 1,476 | #206 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 1,317 | #227 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 1,313 | #231 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 1,519 | #195 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 1,438 | #202 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 1,545 | #194 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 1,705 | #172 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 1,889 | #157 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 1,747 | #187 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 1,688 | #194 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 1,912 | #174 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 1,533 | #209 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 1,315 | #244 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 946 | #333 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 834 | #383 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 705 | #448 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 467 | #656 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 456 | #650 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 447 | #643 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 326 | #796 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 215 | #1,075 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,258 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,395 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,833 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,871 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,473 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,124 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,879 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,194 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,361 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,858 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,682 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,742 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,026 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 12 | #6,900 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,456 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,627 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,488 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,103 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,299 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,358 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,724 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 6 | #8,622 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,605 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 6 | #8,216 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,128 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,572 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,050 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,665 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,668 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,060 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,888 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,308 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,042 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,321 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,618 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,874 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,737 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,921 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,551 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,854 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,386 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,292 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,490 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,377 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,860 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,760 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,258 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,602 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,019 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,445 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,605 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,818 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,457 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,978 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,883 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,934 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,588 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,157 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,391 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,741 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,462 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,882 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,291 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,312 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,360 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,313 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,904 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,066 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,261 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,287 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,217 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,267 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,960 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,380 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,820 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,749 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,035 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,852 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,256 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,623 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,304 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,469 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,989 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,245 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,424 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,615 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,089 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,649 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,966 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,306 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,093 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,326 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,449 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,141 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,577 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,186 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,381 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,391 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,056 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,064 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 10 | #959 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,286 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,223 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 12 | #755 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 7 | #947 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,000 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 11 | #659 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,033 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #684 |
Highest rank
Arabella has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #157 in 2017. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Arabella
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.