Is Titus a boy or girl name?
Titus is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 843 boys were named Titus, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 25,895 US babies named Titus were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #383
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Titus since 1880
- 25,895
- Most popular year
- 2015
- 1,325 babies
Boys and girls named Titus, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 29 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 37 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 226 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 296 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 246 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 250 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 385 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 660 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,069 | 6 | 0.6% |
| 1980s | 1,452 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,601 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 4,454 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 10,682 | 6 | 0.1% |
| 2020s | 4,471 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 843 | #383 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 864 | #374 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 908 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 912 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 944 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 1,044 | #319 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 1,099 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 1,182 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,295 | #282 | 6 | #16,073 |
| 2015 | 1,325 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,276 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 1,067 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 855 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 825 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 714 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 643 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 639 | #442 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 536 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 462 | #548 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 454 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 399 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 344 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 343 | #596 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 341 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 293 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 240 | #701 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 196 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 161 | #870 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 158 | #873 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 148 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 145 | #909 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 120 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 163 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 132 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 138 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 145 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 155 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 127 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 131 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 134 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 156 | #702 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 164 | #668 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 160 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 158 | #688 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 122 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 133 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 126 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 143 | #713 | 6 | #9,559 |
| 1976 | 120 | #759 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 112 | #787 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 118 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 81 | #891 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 84 | #884 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 83 | #898 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 69 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 60 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 51 | #1,044 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 54 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 64 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 83 | #813 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 76 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 72 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 65 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 61 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 74 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 52 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 45 | #1,161 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 47 | #1,128 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 42 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 32 | #1,368 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 49 | #1,079 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 35 | #1,278 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 24 | #1,579 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 27 | #1,456 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 32 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 27 | #1,431 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 26 | #1,457 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 26 | #1,477 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 23 | #1,503 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 20 | #1,531 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 22 | #1,477 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 28 | #1,338 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 22 | #1,532 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 27 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 29 | #1,274 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 22 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 20 | #1,554 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 27 | #1,311 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 18 | #1,636 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 17 | #1,750 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 22 | #1,493 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 28 | #1,278 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 32 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 27 | #1,359 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 33 | #1,256 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 31 | #1,291 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 38 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 23 | #1,639 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 21 | #1,711 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 32 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 26 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 27 | #1,456 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 27 | #1,466 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 28 | #1,447 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 43 | #1,087 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 32 | #1,263 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 33 | #1,228 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 34 | #1,171 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 26 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 27 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 16 | #1,602 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 15 | #1,432 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 17 | #1,168 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 14 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 12 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,664 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,331 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 8 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 12 | #735 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,131 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 6 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 8 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 6 | #1,072 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,242 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 6 | #962 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 7 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 6 | #901 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Titus reached #280 in 2015. As a girl name, it reached #9,559 in 1977. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.