Is Angella a boy or girl name?
Angella was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,570 US babies named Angella were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #13,573
- Babies named Angella since 1895
- 3,570
- Most popular year
- 1971
- 149 babies
Boys and girls named Angella, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 18 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 35 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 43 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 23 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 76 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 155 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 667 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,241 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 595 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 266 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 238 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 165 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 43 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,573 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,367 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,452 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,632 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,013 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,448 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,624 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,016 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,927 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,654 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,681 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,174 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,916 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,813 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,253 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,582 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,772 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,910 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,146 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,820 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,578 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,429 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,720 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,835 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,806 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,209 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,242 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,381 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,890 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,885 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,900 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,678 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,145 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,545 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,716 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,788 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,492 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,130 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,265 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,856 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,020 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,565 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,510 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,492 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,397 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,198 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,087 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,035 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,033 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 134 | #943 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,070 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 129 | #941 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,097 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 149 | #890 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 139 | #926 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,037 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,075 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,219 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,201 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,188 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,265 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,580 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,031 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,894 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,434 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,764 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,450 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,348 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,454 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,554 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,329 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,700 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,673 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,027 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,903 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,897 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,716 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,677 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,689 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,698 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,719 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,753 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,973 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,575 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,363 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,394 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,915 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,576 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,877 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,368 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,405 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,392 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,685 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,421 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,278 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,105 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,445 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,445 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,374 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,141 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,441 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,605 |
Highest rank
Angella has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #890 in 1971. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Angella
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.