Is Annabelle a boy or girl name?
Annabelle is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 891 girls and 0 boys were named Annabelle, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 66,642 US babies named Annabelle were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #349
- Babies named Annabelle since 1880
- 66,642
- Most popular year
- 2014
- 4,363 babies
Boys and girls named Annabelle, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 187 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 414 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 811 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 3,390 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 5,890 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 2,865 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,325 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 587 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 615 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 562 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 580 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 2,017 | 100% |
| 2000s | 5 | 13,179 | 100% |
| 2010s | 5 | 28,941 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 5,269 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 891 | #349 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 915 | #340 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 997 | #322 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 1,146 | #275 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 1,320 | #221 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 1,698 | #171 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 1,987 | #142 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 2,623 | #118 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 3,000 | #104 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 3,282 | #92 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 4,363 | #57 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 3,559 | #81 |
| 2012 | 5 | #12,387 | 3,058 | #99 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 2,731 | #111 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 2,640 | #117 |
| 2009 | 5 | #12,611 | 2,057 | #156 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 1,813 | #188 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 1,731 | #196 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 1,667 | #207 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 1,405 | #239 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 1,067 | #300 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 1,063 | #292 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 917 | #331 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 862 | #349 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 597 | #464 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 521 | #499 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 359 | #641 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 241 | #848 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 211 | #926 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 194 | #970 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,313 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,519 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,486 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,779 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,905 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,575 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,969 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,157 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,053 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,022 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,728 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,024 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,023 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,937 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,905 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,020 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,392 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,834 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,423 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,936 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,775 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,480 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,676 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,613 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,389 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,227 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,749 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,507 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,352 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,368 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,432 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,623 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,474 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,328 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,374 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,327 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,300 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,428 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,471 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,110 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,393 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,440 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,259 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,134 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 100 | #890 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 111 | #836 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 116 | #801 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 112 | #828 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 115 | #767 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 105 | #728 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 134 | #631 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 135 | #652 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 153 | #600 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 156 | #559 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 188 | #503 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 194 | #479 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 218 | #456 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 175 | #499 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 215 | #440 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 248 | #415 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 282 | #380 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 263 | #396 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 356 | #336 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 452 | #298 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 462 | #309 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 480 | #303 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 566 | #274 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 567 | #276 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 629 | #266 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 574 | #278 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 673 | #254 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 615 | #260 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 584 | #266 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 631 | #262 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 571 | #273 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 472 | #294 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 484 | #288 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 500 | #275 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 448 | #282 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 427 | #284 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 315 | #295 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 240 | #305 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 219 | #310 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 164 | #309 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 121 | #361 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 108 | #347 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 113 | #335 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 94 | #363 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 78 | #388 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 90 | #352 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 76 | #377 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 60 | #407 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 65 | #387 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 54 | #406 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 73 | #388 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 45 | #433 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 77 | #355 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 28 | #568 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 44 | #434 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 42 | #438 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 33 | #495 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 31 | #487 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 41 | #413 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 33 | #440 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 40 | #400 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 29 | #456 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 19 | #574 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 22 | #475 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 21 | #477 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 27 | #395 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 14 | #557 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 11 | #584 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 22 | #377 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 13 | #471 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 9 | #585 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Annabelle reached #12,387 in 2012. As a girl name, it reached #57 in 2014. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Annabelle
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.