Is Annabel a boy or girl name?
Annabel is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 130 girls and 0 boys were named Annabel, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 14,880 US babies named Annabel were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,601
- Babies named Annabel since 1880
- 14,880
- Most popular year
- 2014
- 716 babies
Boys and girls named Annabel, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 127 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 217 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 275 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 922 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,087 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 429 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 243 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 261 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 374 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 403 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 690 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,332 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 3,131 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 4,655 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 734 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 130 | #1,601 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,803 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,573 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 169 | #1,327 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 188 | #1,214 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 220 | #1,109 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 279 | #951 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 348 | #789 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 410 | #701 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 463 | #621 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 716 | #447 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 632 | #481 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 583 | #519 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 537 | #541 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 467 | #629 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 405 | #711 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 361 | #799 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 361 | #796 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 318 | #844 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 338 | #776 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 289 | #850 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 281 | #859 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 285 | #813 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 266 | #856 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 227 | #941 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 195 | #1,044 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 182 | #1,070 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 149 | #1,206 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,329 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 130 | #1,286 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,416 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,485 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,549 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,486 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 122 | #1,326 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,373 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,492 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,591 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,738 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,563 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,814 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,049 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,290 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,914 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,805 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,274 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,938 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,028 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,776 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,964 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,173 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,409 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,357 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,110 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,579 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,138 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,300 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,849 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,953 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,595 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,870 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,982 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,990 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,667 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,017 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,021 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,261 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,659 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,054 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,109 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,452 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,707 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,579 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,019 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,724 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,917 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,011 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,794 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,812 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,749 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,203 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,835 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,805 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,356 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,519 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,161 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,383 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,331 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,379 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,245 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,079 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,087 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 64 | #869 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 61 | #877 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 62 | #926 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 73 | #828 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 76 | #825 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 93 | #739 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 113 | #686 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 113 | #694 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 123 | #669 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 118 | #683 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 118 | #671 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 130 | #649 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 130 | #628 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 124 | #631 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 129 | #623 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 121 | #621 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 129 | #589 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 112 | #622 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 87 | #613 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 63 | #651 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 61 | #633 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 51 | #594 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 45 | #630 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 28 | #761 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 34 | #665 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 34 | #637 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 16 | #920 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 27 | #684 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 19 | #837 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 26 | #657 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 22 | #737 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 32 | #538 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 37 | #568 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 24 | #630 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 30 | #587 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 16 | #790 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 33 | #515 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 15 | #818 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 16 | #749 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 26 | #547 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 22 | #591 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 16 | #669 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 19 | #603 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 24 | #516 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 17 | #613 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 13 | #637 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 15 | #573 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 10 | #697 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 11 | #642 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 8 | #698 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 10 | #596 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 6 | #743 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 13 | #467 |
Highest rank
Annabel has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #447 in 2014. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Annabel
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.