Is Annabell a boy or girl name?
Annabell is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 17 girls and 0 boys were named Annabell, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 6,704 US babies named Annabell were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #6,635
- Babies named Annabell since 1882
- 6,704
- Most popular year
- 2014
- 291 babies
Boys and girls named Annabell, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 50 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 219 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 612 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,080 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 575 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 266 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 164 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 163 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 138 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 152 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 191 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,057 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,788 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,635 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,436 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,681 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,103 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,272 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,851 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,784 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 96 | #2,036 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,786 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 162 | #1,425 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 291 | #923 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 267 | #947 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 257 | #978 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 265 | #965 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 235 | #1,055 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 197 | #1,249 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,395 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,636 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,773 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,768 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,204 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,282 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,312 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,706 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,979 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,980 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,499 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,382 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,191 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,858 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,002 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,978 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,068 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,020 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,850 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,852 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 12 | #6,301 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,817 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,163 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,860 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,001 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,820 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,730 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,753 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,333 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,636 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,975 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,242 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,633 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,177 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,700 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,644 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,984 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,375 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,046 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,734 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,661 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,347 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,944 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,407 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,001 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,343 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,818 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,756 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,249 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,395 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,913 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,318 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,705 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,100 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,381 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,117 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,328 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,122 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,187 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,215 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,418 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,822 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,771 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,750 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,457 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,368 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,632 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,472 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,347 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,179 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,008 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,303 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,006 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 57 | #912 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 58 | #894 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 62 | #851 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 74 | #790 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 89 | #709 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 69 | #861 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 111 | #661 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 101 | #696 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 110 | #693 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 85 | #784 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 109 | #707 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 118 | #683 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 120 | #678 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 114 | #685 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 117 | #684 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 95 | #740 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 86 | #758 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 81 | #791 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 79 | #776 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 70 | #811 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 74 | #769 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 61 | #736 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 45 | #783 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 52 | #698 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 27 | #826 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 37 | #698 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 23 | #846 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 22 | #830 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 24 | #763 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 33 | #622 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 25 | #716 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 19 | #838 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 24 | #680 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 17 | #850 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 15 | #858 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 17 | #919 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 12 | #935 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 16 | #843 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 15 | #830 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,001 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 16 | #790 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 11 | #952 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 17 | #715 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,466 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,012 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,105 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 10 | #844 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 9 | #794 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 10 | #734 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 9 | #747 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 6 | #932 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 6 | #817 |
Highest rank
Annabell has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #622 in 1906. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Annabell
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.