Is Allegra a boy or girl name?
Allegra is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 40 girls and 0 boys were named Allegra, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,696 US babies named Allegra were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,748
- Babies named Allegra since 1902
- 4,696
- Most popular year
- 1988
- 154 babies
Boys and girls named Allegra, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 171 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 174 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 101 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 109 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 189 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 419 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 676 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,196 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 606 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 686 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 246 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,748 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,045 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,367 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,493 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,713 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,001 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,004 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,509 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,100 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,339 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,559 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,975 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,937 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,417 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,769 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 101 | #2,029 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,171 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,293 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,780 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,210 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,953 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,662 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,893 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,845 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,239 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,719 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,272 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 152 | #1,193 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,318 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 144 | #1,187 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,608 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,426 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 122 | #1,357 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,537 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,479 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,354 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 154 | #1,045 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,811 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,170 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,906 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,991 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,199 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,533 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,028 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,904 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,151 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,390 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,124 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,747 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,024 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,348 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,731 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,224 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,212 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,017 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,455 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,247 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,966 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,043 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,150 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,695 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,706 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,035 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,191 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,356 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,440 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,896 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,313 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,929 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,072 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,161 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,922 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,811 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,395 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,655 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,620 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,597 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,014 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,744 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,138 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,692 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,562 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,669 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,401 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,216 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,927 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,736 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,738 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,861 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,441 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,004 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,163 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,281 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,111 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,204 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,742 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,285 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,097 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,773 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,197 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,666 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,946 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,296 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,286 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,668 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,699 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,646 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,508 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,445 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,318 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,271 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,604 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,365 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,303 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,800 |
Highest rank
Allegra has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,045 in 1988. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Allegra
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.