Is Alonzo a boy or girl name?
Alonzo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 594 boys were named Alonzo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 45,514 US babies named Alonzo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #512
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Alonzo since 1880
- 45,514
- Most popular year
- 2022
- 651 babies
Boys and girls named Alonzo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,088 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 879 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 808 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 2,218 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 2,986 | 10 | 0.3% |
| 1930s | 2,434 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 2,647 | 5 | 0.2% |
| 1950s | 3,966 | 37 | 0.9% |
| 1960s | 4,394 | 25 | 0.6% |
| 1970s | 3,491 | 32 | 0.9% |
| 1980s | 3,619 | 45 | 1.2% |
| 1990s | 4,262 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 4,328 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 5,250 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,990 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 594 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 551 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 651 | #471 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 569 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 625 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 633 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 612 | #474 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 549 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 499 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 542 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 527 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 545 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 454 | #568 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 455 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 434 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 412 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 483 | #543 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 432 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 450 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 452 | #537 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 421 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 436 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 433 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 375 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 434 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 410 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 394 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 450 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 407 | #507 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 453 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 469 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 421 | #494 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 398 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 428 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 432 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 426 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 460 | #421 | 7 | #9,279 |
| 1987 | 406 | #441 | 7 | #8,809 |
| 1986 | 371 | #452 | 5 | #10,960 |
| 1985 | 315 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 321 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 322 | #466 | 5 | #10,321 |
| 1982 | 325 | #469 | 8 | #7,490 |
| 1981 | 310 | #473 | 6 | #9,142 |
| 1980 | 363 | #431 | 7 | #8,196 |
| 1979 | 334 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 282 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 360 | #416 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 301 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 331 | #432 | 7 | #7,192 |
| 1974 | 337 | #427 | 5 | #8,817 |
| 1973 | 356 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 368 | #411 | 6 | #7,308 |
| 1971 | 418 | #394 | 7 | #6,633 |
| 1970 | 404 | #402 | 7 | #6,382 |
| 1969 | 414 | #385 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 384 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 405 | #371 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 384 | #389 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 422 | #376 | 7 | #5,293 |
| 1964 | 449 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 458 | #370 | 5 | #6,606 |
| 1962 | 538 | #336 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 477 | #364 | 8 | #4,890 |
| 1960 | 463 | #367 | 5 | #6,399 |
| 1959 | 443 | #375 | 7 | #5,043 |
| 1958 | 454 | #362 | 6 | #5,419 |
| 1957 | 377 | #400 | 5 | #6,099 |
| 1956 | 418 | #360 | 6 | #5,331 |
| 1955 | 415 | #354 | 8 | #4,380 |
| 1954 | 375 | #366 | 5 | #5,764 |
| 1953 | 395 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 341 | #365 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 383 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 365 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 297 | #390 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 350 | #360 | 5 | #5,254 |
| 1947 | 300 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 259 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 219 | #408 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 235 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 263 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 244 | #389 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 224 | #383 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 256 | #357 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 249 | #352 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 233 | #368 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 226 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 207 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 240 | #354 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 253 | #345 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 252 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 271 | #333 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 235 | #368 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 268 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 239 | #372 | 5 | #4,589 |
| 1928 | 265 | #350 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 287 | #338 | 5 | #4,826 |
| 1926 | 298 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 295 | #336 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 340 | #310 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 319 | #327 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 320 | #321 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 315 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 308 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 321 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 287 | #336 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 286 | #319 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 274 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 267 | #318 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 204 | #318 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 184 | #293 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 177 | #263 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 128 | #223 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 90 | #254 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 95 | #223 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 57 | #288 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 82 | #224 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 85 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 93 | #190 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 76 | #211 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 56 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 81 | #199 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 67 | #208 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 116 | #182 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 78 | #180 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 104 | #161 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 84 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 89 | #182 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 85 | #185 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 102 | #150 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 71 | #201 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 104 | #154 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 74 | #175 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 88 | #161 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 102 | #141 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 110 | #139 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 88 | #144 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 106 | #128 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 104 | #130 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 112 | #128 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 100 | #123 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 133 | #111 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 111 | #110 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 122 | #110 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Alonzo reached #110 in 1880. As a girl name, it reached #4,380 in 1955. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Alonzo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.