Is Milo a boy or girl name?
Milo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 23 girls and 2,988 boys were named Milo, so 0.8% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1.1% of the 41,290 US babies named Milo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #120
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,537
- Babies named Milo since 1880
- 41,290
- Most popular year
- 2022
- 3,158 babies
Boys and girls named Milo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 219 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 225 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 261 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,378 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,687 | 24 | 1.4% |
| 1930s | 1,165 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 904 | 10 | 1.1% |
| 1950s | 885 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 522 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 563 | 10 | 1.7% |
| 1980s | 514 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 656 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 3,298 | 27 | 0.8% |
| 2010s | 13,821 | 203 | 1.4% |
| 2020s | 14,747 | 171 | 1.1% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,988 | #120 | 23 | #5,537 |
| 2023 | 2,963 | #121 | 34 | #4,250 |
| 2022 | 3,111 | #120 | 47 | #3,395 |
| 2021 | 2,918 | #127 | 37 | #3,985 |
| 2020 | 2,767 | #134 | 30 | #4,513 |
| 2019 | 2,442 | #162 | 41 | #3,703 |
| 2018 | 2,199 | #178 | 33 | #4,308 |
| 2017 | 1,704 | #224 | 27 | #5,010 |
| 2016 | 1,510 | #248 | 26 | #5,235 |
| 2015 | 1,284 | #288 | 13 | #8,784 |
| 2014 | 1,120 | #311 | 11 | #9,965 |
| 2013 | 1,098 | #312 | 18 | #6,932 |
| 2012 | 971 | #325 | 11 | #10,200 |
| 2011 | 838 | #358 | 12 | #9,546 |
| 2010 | 655 | #423 | 11 | #10,251 |
| 2009 | 618 | #450 | 10 | #11,230 |
| 2008 | 633 | #444 | 11 | #10,566 |
| 2007 | 476 | #539 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 338 | #673 | 6 | #16,491 |
| 2005 | 282 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 236 | #769 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 220 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 212 | #808 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 156 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 127 | #1,113 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 81 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 100 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 82 | #1,361 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 58 | #1,664 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 53 | #1,699 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 51 | #1,747 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 44 | #1,887 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 48 | #1,770 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 56 | #1,555 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 83 | #1,197 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 61 | #1,405 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 42 | #1,694 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 48 | #1,498 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 42 | #1,579 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 52 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 55 | #1,246 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 56 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 63 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 50 | #1,321 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 45 | #1,426 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 62 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 56 | #1,196 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 57 | #1,170 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 63 | #1,053 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 49 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 46 | #1,240 | 5 | #9,694 |
| 1973 | 63 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 54 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 59 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 54 | #1,126 | 5 | #8,858 |
| 1969 | 45 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 41 | #1,202 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 50 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 45 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 56 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 62 | #972 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 57 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 52 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 61 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 53 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 70 | #918 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 69 | #913 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 76 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 85 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 109 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 97 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 82 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 95 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 104 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 98 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 89 | #733 | 5 | #5,785 |
| 1948 | 102 | #670 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 88 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 91 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 86 | #653 | 5 | #5,036 |
| 1944 | 76 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 107 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 71 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 94 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 100 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 85 | #645 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 95 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 111 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 120 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 95 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 128 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 124 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 123 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 128 | #510 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 156 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 144 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 157 | #485 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 151 | #496 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 131 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 157 | #486 | 5 | #5,535 |
| 1924 | 163 | #486 | 6 | #4,862 |
| 1923 | 174 | #466 | 6 | #4,790 |
| 1922 | 196 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 197 | #435 | 7 | #4,312 |
| 1920 | 217 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 196 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 185 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 193 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 193 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 180 | #401 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 149 | #391 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 112 | #408 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 95 | #395 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 45 | #438 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 30 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 33 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 28 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 36 | #376 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 30 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 18 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 21 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 22 | #442 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 24 | #423 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 27 | #357 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 22 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 21 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 22 | #427 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 20 | #431 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 31 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 18 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 25 | #375 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 20 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 35 | #314 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 16 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 17 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 17 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 20 | #426 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 23 | #350 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 24 | #352 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 21 | #390 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 22 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 20 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 27 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 19 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 26 | #339 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Milo reached #120 in 2022. As a girl name, it reached #3,395 in 2022. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Milo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.