Is Millicent a boy or girl name?
Millicent is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 126 girls and 0 boys were named Millicent, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 11,718 US babies named Millicent were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,639
- Babies named Millicent since 1880
- 11,718
- Most popular year
- 1927
- 249 babies
Boys and girls named Millicent, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 84 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 141 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 278 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,119 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 2,014 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,337 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 993 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,054 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,020 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 710 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 541 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 410 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 459 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 980 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 578 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,639 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,789 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,924 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,559 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,938 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,679 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,723 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 133 | #1,632 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,740 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 83 | #2,273 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,088 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,011 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,508 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,630 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,665 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,236 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,880 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,203 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,775 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,173 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,056 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,108 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,147 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,237 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,199 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,482 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,893 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,649 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,009 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,468 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,284 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,805 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,287 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,864 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,553 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,909 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,120 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,383 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,014 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,012 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,105 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,740 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,842 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,749 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,781 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,011 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,851 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,551 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,557 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,394 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,545 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,411 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,430 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,249 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,138 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,224 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,050 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,191 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,108 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,000 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,056 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,013 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,041 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,035 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 119 | #984 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,033 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,064 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,020 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 111 | #961 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 126 | #868 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 118 | #885 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 107 | #911 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,044 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 98 | #932 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 102 | #882 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 113 | #830 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 109 | #840 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 104 | #860 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 84 | #917 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 82 | #837 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 96 | #784 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 100 | #782 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 102 | #750 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 102 | #698 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 101 | #696 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 90 | #721 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 112 | #649 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 131 | #591 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 155 | #521 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 109 | #626 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 132 | #560 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 139 | #539 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 150 | #535 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 149 | #542 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 170 | #516 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 176 | #511 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 226 | #458 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 249 | #435 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 220 | #468 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 208 | #486 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 211 | #482 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 176 | #541 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 180 | #524 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 179 | #533 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 189 | #503 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 144 | #583 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 141 | #601 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 160 | #529 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 120 | #618 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 147 | #517 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 108 | #536 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 111 | #483 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 71 | #574 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 63 | #525 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 54 | #562 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 42 | #603 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 39 | #609 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 30 | #701 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 32 | #639 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 24 | #754 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 23 | #749 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 27 | #649 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 23 | #732 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,050 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 27 | #696 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 15 | #862 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 14 | #948 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 19 | #732 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 16 | #831 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,032 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 16 | #773 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 15 | #784 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 10 | #996 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 9 | #986 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 16 | #686 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 15 | #678 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 11 | #824 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 10 | #776 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 11 | #719 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 9 | #781 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,114 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 9 | #676 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 6 | #871 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 8 | #662 |
Highest rank
Millicent has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #435 in 1927. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Millicent
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.