Is Manuela a boy or girl name?
Manuela is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 90 girls and 0 boys were named Manuela, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.7% of the 10,996 US babies named Manuela were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,121
- Babies named Manuela since 1880
- 10,996
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 202 babies
Boys and girls named Manuela, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 76 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 163 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 368 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 999 | 100% |
| 1920s | 17 | 1,895 | 99.1% |
| 1930s | 18 | 1,139 | 98.4% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,087 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 813 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 638 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 655 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 596 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 681 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 739 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 697 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 415 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,121 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,480 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,242 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,378 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,016 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,555 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 86 | #2,183 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,373 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,635 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,798 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,301 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,960 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,824 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,501 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,828 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,876 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,500 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,671 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,367 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,659 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,222 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,240 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,058 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 82 | #2,058 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,359 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,553 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,178 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,754 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,141 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,299 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,157 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,024 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,607 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,949 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,454 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,794 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,429 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,037 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,043 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,777 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,525 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,982 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,776 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,690 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,479 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,701 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,576 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,524 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,366 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,445 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,495 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,519 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,685 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,569 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,691 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,415 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,295 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,291 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,847 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,510 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,476 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,412 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,262 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,424 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,307 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,321 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,201 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,113 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,224 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,343 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,162 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 105 | #923 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,085 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,128 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 125 | #773 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 110 | #844 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 145 | #693 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 124 | #774 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 118 | #755 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 111 | #710 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 107 | #736 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 100 | #781 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 92 | #796 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 94 | #732 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 86 | #747 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 94 | #703 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 92 | #716 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 102 | #676 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 104 | #650 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 100 | #660 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 103 | #662 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 132 | #555 |
| 1932 | 5 | #4,099 | 120 | #600 |
| 1931 | 7 | #3,290 | 136 | #564 |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,854 | 156 | #544 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 173 | #515 |
| 1928 | 6 | #3,981 | 192 | #501 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,569 | 191 | #508 |
| 1926 | 6 | #4,020 | 190 | #506 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 197 | #503 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 202 | #491 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 169 | #556 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 184 | #517 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 197 | #502 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 200 | #486 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 158 | #550 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 151 | #584 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 104 | #669 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 122 | #612 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 111 | #624 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 89 | #606 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 76 | #593 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 71 | #573 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 56 | #578 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 61 | #525 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 58 | #491 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 38 | #624 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 43 | #560 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 43 | #535 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 37 | #576 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 32 | #606 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 29 | #621 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 24 | #707 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 23 | #676 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 41 | #528 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 25 | #624 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 21 | #738 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 16 | #814 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 18 | #778 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 20 | #717 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 14 | #834 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 15 | #782 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 15 | #784 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,289 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 13 | #780 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 8 | #999 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,233 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 8 | #912 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 7 | #960 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 9 | #780 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 10 | #713 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 8 | #736 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 8 | #716 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #723 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 5 | #901 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Manuela reached #3,290 in 1931. As a girl name, it reached #486 in 1920. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Manuela
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.