Is Margret a boy or girl name?
Margret is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 16 girls and 0 boys were named Margret, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 10,047 US babies named Margret were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #7,098
- Babies named Margret since 1880
- 10,047
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 214 babies
Boys and girls named Margret, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 307 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 339 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 437 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,236 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,850 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,237 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,061 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,054 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 832 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 504 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 375 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 351 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 264 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 144 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 56 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,098 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,803 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,907 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,038 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,247 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,915 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,439 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,145 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,853 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,759 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,897 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,617 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,347 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,020 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,401 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,235 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,623 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,349 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,152 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,379 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,488 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,084 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,581 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,180 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,707 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,400 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,053 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,203 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,898 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,549 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,148 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,083 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,536 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,293 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,994 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,698 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,683 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,468 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,512 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,907 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,103 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,498 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,875 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,474 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,516 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,509 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,497 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,913 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,923 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,700 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,764 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,601 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,647 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,790 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,554 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,474 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,306 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,200 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,132 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,298 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,080 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,145 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,147 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,160 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,193 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,269 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,076 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,130 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,031 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 100 | #999 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 113 | #906 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 124 | #833 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 128 | #803 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 105 | #880 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 131 | #757 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 143 | #711 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 108 | #842 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 122 | #785 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 105 | #807 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 85 | #820 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 97 | #775 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 108 | #749 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 104 | #741 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 87 | #775 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 102 | #691 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 107 | #658 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 110 | #653 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 123 | #608 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 81 | #746 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 121 | #591 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 113 | #626 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 122 | #583 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 143 | #548 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 136 | #565 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 181 | #496 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 153 | #555 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 163 | #548 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 199 | #496 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 194 | #502 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 172 | #549 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 196 | #507 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 177 | #538 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 198 | #493 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 214 | #472 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 184 | #517 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 177 | #510 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 199 | #480 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 168 | #513 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 162 | #514 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 111 | #625 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 119 | #512 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 84 | #560 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 90 | #509 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 59 | #553 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 67 | #499 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 44 | #585 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 56 | #485 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 51 | #503 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 47 | #507 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 51 | #480 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 37 | #554 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 37 | #537 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 33 | #579 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 32 | #543 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 49 | #485 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 33 | #521 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 34 | #553 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 30 | #549 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 39 | #466 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 36 | #490 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 30 | #531 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 31 | #498 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 33 | #475 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 39 | #398 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 34 | #438 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 28 | #474 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 46 | #354 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 22 | #484 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 25 | #435 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 39 | #326 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 32 | #355 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 30 | #327 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 39 | #286 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 22 | #356 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 24 | #332 |
Highest rank
Margret has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #286 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Margret
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.