Is Amada a boy or girl name?
Amada is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 45 girls and 0 boys were named Amada, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,490 US babies named Amada were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,441
- Babies named Amada since 1890
- 2,490
- Most popular year
- 2019
- 50 babies
Boys and girls named Amada, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 39 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 41 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 109 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 238 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 157 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 146 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 140 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 191 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 314 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 275 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 232 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 265 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 212 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,441 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,910 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,536 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,885 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,282 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,174 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,246 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,818 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,456 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,038 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,223 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,068 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,597 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,951 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,397 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,822 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,153 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,906 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,562 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,839 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,711 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,598 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,287 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,587 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,993 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,720 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,918 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,903 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,294 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,851 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,025 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,507 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,344 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,540 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,160 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,574 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,987 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,914 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,652 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,940 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,471 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,398 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,370 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,534 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,417 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,341 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,010 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,002 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,544 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,531 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,429 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,483 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,901 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,875 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,070 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,430 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,322 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,660 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,939 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,506 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,520 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,466 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,296 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,321 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,213 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,828 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,665 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,701 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,329 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,384 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,723 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,822 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,558 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,249 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,430 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,518 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,599 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,534 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,320 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,063 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,406 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,253 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,452 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,021 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,034 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,042 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,023 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,320 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,114 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,848 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,652 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,607 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,496 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,503 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,612 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,645 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,427 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,621 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,669 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,650 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,569 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,491 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,486 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,868 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,596 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,069 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,523 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,109 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,373 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,054 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,132 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,034 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,726 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,486 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,421 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,222 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,835 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,962 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,495 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,324 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,804 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,941 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,611 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,175 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,266 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,433 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,357 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,218 |
Highest rank
Amada has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,175 in 1898. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Amada
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.