Is Amado a boy or girl name?
Amado is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 158 boys were named Amado, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 4,593 US babies named Amado were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,245
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Amado since 1883
- 4,593
- Most popular year
- 2023
- 173 babies
Boys and girls named Amado, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 118 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 313 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 290 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 287 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 360 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 324 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 390 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 398 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 481 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 468 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 466 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 693 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 158 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 173 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 165 | #1,204 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 107 | #1,597 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 90 | #1,716 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 88 | #1,762 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 59 | #2,282 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 40 | #2,958 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 47 | #2,626 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 42 | #2,808 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 44 | #2,708 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 42 | #2,764 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 42 | #2,812 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 32 | #3,365 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 30 | #3,532 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 37 | #3,108 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 37 | #3,107 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 54 | #2,372 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 57 | #2,223 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 59 | #2,084 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 42 | #2,570 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 43 | #2,429 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 27 | #3,263 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 48 | #2,152 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 64 | #1,742 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 53 | #1,860 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 59 | #1,722 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 50 | #1,858 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 56 | #1,690 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 37 | #2,178 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 41 | #2,013 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 58 | #1,555 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 40 | #1,982 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 35 | #2,098 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 52 | #1,587 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 38 | #1,920 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 40 | #1,733 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 37 | #1,762 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 31 | #1,918 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 41 | #1,569 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 42 | #1,481 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 30 | #1,824 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 49 | #1,342 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 49 | #1,335 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 41 | #1,497 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 35 | #1,633 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 42 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 47 | #1,313 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 34 | #1,573 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 45 | #1,281 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 44 | #1,270 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 37 | #1,375 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 30 | #1,566 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 39 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 37 | #1,374 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 29 | #1,493 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 30 | #1,431 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 39 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 23 | #1,614 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 36 | #1,272 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 28 | #1,489 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 28 | #1,485 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 37 | #1,280 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 41 | #1,234 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 33 | #1,383 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 36 | #1,302 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 29 | #1,447 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 37 | #1,279 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 40 | #1,203 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 38 | #1,220 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 40 | #1,186 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 35 | #1,261 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 30 | #1,378 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 42 | #1,109 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 33 | #1,256 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 24 | #1,501 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 43 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 30 | #1,336 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 30 | #1,277 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 25 | #1,328 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 31 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 30 | #1,259 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 22 | #1,497 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 29 | #1,231 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 23 | #1,399 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 14 | #1,881 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 23 | #1,397 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 35 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 16 | #1,726 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 31 | #1,196 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 30 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 29 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 44 | #992 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 34 | #1,172 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 34 | #1,216 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 41 | #1,078 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 41 | #1,095 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 34 | #1,248 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 27 | #1,405 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 42 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 34 | #1,247 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 20 | #1,755 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 30 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 23 | #1,589 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 21 | #1,697 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 24 | #1,483 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,548 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 15 | #1,989 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 14 | #2,046 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 9 | #2,630 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 12 | #1,871 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 17 | #1,257 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 8 | #1,892 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #897 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Amado reached #897 in 1883. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Amado
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.