Is Conley a boy or girl name?
Conley is used for both boys and girls in close to equal numbers in the US. In 2024, 42 girls and 61 boys were named Conley, so 40.8% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 12.1% of the 4,562 US babies named Conley were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,309
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,649
- Babies named Conley since 1882
- 4,562
- Most popular year
- 2022
- 115 babies
Boys and girls named Conley, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 18 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 58 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 285 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 429 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 412 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 436 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 314 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 219 | 5 | 2.2% |
| 1970s | 169 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 149 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 214 | 47 | 18% |
| 2000s | 312 | 84 | 21.2% |
| 2010s | 680 | 215 | 24% |
| 2020s | 297 | 203 | 40.6% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 61 | #2,309 | 42 | #3,649 |
| 2023 | 69 | #2,111 | 34 | #4,208 |
| 2022 | 62 | #2,298 | 53 | #3,082 |
| 2021 | 55 | #2,444 | 38 | #3,895 |
| 2020 | 50 | #2,557 | 36 | #3,942 |
| 2019 | 59 | #2,317 | 41 | #3,680 |
| 2018 | 53 | #2,449 | 14 | #7,855 |
| 2017 | 71 | #2,005 | 32 | #4,412 |
| 2016 | 76 | #1,926 | 27 | #5,030 |
| 2015 | 75 | #1,934 | 18 | #6,785 |
| 2014 | 71 | #2,005 | 17 | #7,063 |
| 2013 | 58 | #2,230 | 19 | #6,528 |
| 2012 | 72 | #1,965 | 14 | #8,307 |
| 2011 | 77 | #1,836 | 21 | #6,194 |
| 2010 | 68 | #2,016 | 12 | #9,357 |
| 2009 | 46 | #2,669 | 12 | #9,522 |
| 2008 | 40 | #2,956 | 9 | #11,806 |
| 2007 | 38 | #3,036 | 14 | #8,627 |
| 2006 | 26 | #3,804 | 8 | #12,673 |
| 2005 | 25 | #3,734 | 11 | #9,597 |
| 2004 | 22 | #4,037 | 9 | #10,886 |
| 2003 | 33 | #2,938 | 7 | #12,698 |
| 2002 | 31 | #2,957 | 9 | #10,414 |
| 2001 | 23 | #3,635 | 5 | #15,875 |
| 2000 | 28 | #3,089 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 31 | #2,736 | 5 | #14,910 |
| 1998 | 21 | #3,509 | 8 | #10,319 |
| 1997 | 24 | #3,085 | 10 | #8,495 |
| 1996 | 18 | #3,705 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 26 | #2,778 | 10 | #8,218 |
| 1994 | 22 | #3,126 | 9 | #8,981 |
| 1993 | 20 | #3,266 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 19 | #3,357 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 18 | #3,348 | 5 | #13,607 |
| 1990 | 15 | #3,808 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 14 | #3,840 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 16 | #3,238 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 12 | #3,769 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 21 | #2,529 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 9 | #4,389 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 13 | #3,298 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 17 | #2,692 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 20 | #2,442 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 17 | #2,694 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 10 | #3,896 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 13 | #3,205 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 12 | #3,248 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 8 | #4,235 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 22 | #2,126 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 16 | #2,553 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 12 | #2,981 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 27 | #1,702 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 21 | #1,979 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 16 | #2,384 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 22 | #1,899 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 19 | #1,920 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 30 | #1,434 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 23 | #1,613 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 17 | #1,904 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 23 | #1,634 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 17 | #1,983 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 33 | #1,356 | 5 | #6,772 |
| 1962 | 20 | #1,814 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 17 | #2,007 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 20 | #1,821 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 22 | #1,727 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 32 | #1,377 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 28 | #1,493 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 23 | #1,649 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 31 | #1,375 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 36 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 38 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 29 | #1,411 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 39 | #1,156 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 36 | #1,206 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 51 | #972 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 51 | #976 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 39 | #1,163 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 53 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 37 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 53 | #871 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 41 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 41 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 37 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 33 | #1,163 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 51 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 37 | #1,066 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 28 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 34 | #1,121 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 35 | #1,103 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 50 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 43 | #961 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 45 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 42 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 47 | #993 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 48 | #976 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 38 | #1,148 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 47 | #1,022 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 42 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 44 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 55 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 38 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 42 | #1,087 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 39 | #1,146 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 36 | #1,211 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 36 | #1,168 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 39 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 38 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 45 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 44 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 29 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 18 | #1,218 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 15 | #1,233 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 9 | #1,208 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 12 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,426 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 7 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 12 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 5 | #1,156 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 11 | #796 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 5 | #1,115 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 6 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 7 | #874 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 6 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 5 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 5 | #966 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Conley reached #709 in 1905. As a girl name, it reached #3,082 in 2022. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Conley
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.