Is Angelena a boy or girl name?
Angelena is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 12 girls and 0 boys were named Angelena, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,205 US babies named Angelena were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #8,458
- Babies named Angelena since 1902
- 3,205
- Most popular year
- 2005
- 119 babies
Boys and girls named Angelena, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 28 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 113 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 155 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 64 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 73 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 75 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 217 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 400 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 446 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 470 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 886 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 217 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 61 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,458 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,376 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,450 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,988 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,242 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,177 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,434 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,832 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,168 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,670 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,473 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,150 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,976 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,364 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,966 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,829 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,662 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,512 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 85 | #2,250 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 119 | #1,670 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,644 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,770 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,806 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,065 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,174 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,644 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,120 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,424 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,763 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,846 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,102 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,994 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,388 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,521 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,201 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,442 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,808 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,310 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,625 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,365 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,626 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,098 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,875 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,986 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,220 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,770 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,631 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,095 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,099 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,935 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,172 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,691 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,947 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,107 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,396 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,518 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,633 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,275 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,251 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,951 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,523 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,177 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,788 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,193 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,906 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,445 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,430 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,395 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,984 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,077 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,726 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,966 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,855 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,239 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,692 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,594 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,249 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,038 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,043 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,767 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,640 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,221 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,274 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,864 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,451 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,209 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,164 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,170 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,878 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,648 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,361 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,597 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,773 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,559 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,479 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,948 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,144 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,948 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,114 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,201 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,017 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,389 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,965 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,656 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,374 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,701 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,444 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,341 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,373 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,488 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,153 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,370 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,561 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,605 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,809 |
Highest rank
Angelena has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,370 in 1909. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Angelena
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.