Is Angelita a boy or girl name?
Angelita is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 26 girls and 0 boys were named Angelita, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.7% of the 11,722 US babies named Angelita were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,019
- Babies named Angelita since 1883
- 11,722
- Most popular year
- 1975
- 182 babies
Boys and girls named Angelita, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 36 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 66 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 160 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 443 | 100% |
| 1920s | 8 | 1,069 | 99.3% |
| 1930s | 18 | 1,088 | 98.4% |
| 1940s | 6 | 1,199 | 99.5% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,327 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,411 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,601 | 100% |
| 1980s | 5 | 1,135 | 99.6% |
| 1990s | 0 | 846 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 836 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 350 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,019 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,402 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,244 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,403 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,761 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,818 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,781 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,486 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,745 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,599 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,468 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,709 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,052 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,228 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,258 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 57 | #3,003 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,693 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,248 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,207 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,278 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,088 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,917 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,935 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,727 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,036 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 75 | #2,053 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,147 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,966 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,996 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,881 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,689 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,579 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,391 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,690 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,569 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,589 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,551 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,532 |
| 1986 | 5 | #6,771 | 82 | #1,506 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,311 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,153 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,207 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 134 | #1,069 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 160 | #932 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 177 | #866 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,074 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 160 | #898 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 147 | #943 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 154 | #873 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 182 | #774 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 180 | #770 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 147 | #874 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 174 | #784 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 162 | #847 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 167 | #823 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 137 | #903 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 174 | #754 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 133 | #886 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 144 | #830 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 153 | #798 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 135 | #896 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 124 | #949 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 124 | #952 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 139 | #915 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 148 | #854 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 142 | #860 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 171 | #762 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 121 | #937 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 121 | #915 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 110 | #938 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 129 | #827 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 119 | #857 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 140 | #752 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 142 | #733 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 132 | #751 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 133 | #742 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 160 | #660 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 124 | #772 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 130 | #706 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 141 | #610 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 105 | #741 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 126 | #676 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 103 | #743 |
| 1941 | 6 | #3,152 | 91 | #747 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 86 | #741 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 104 | #667 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 97 | #698 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 107 | #657 |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,162 | 95 | #683 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 120 | #592 |
| 1934 | 7 | #2,983 | 121 | #595 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 95 | #670 |
| 1932 | 5 | #3,801 | 129 | #578 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 98 | #673 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 122 | #626 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 119 | #634 |
| 1928 | 8 | #3,091 | 104 | #686 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 116 | #671 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 134 | #612 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 124 | #661 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 118 | #682 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 91 | #761 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 92 | #763 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 78 | #838 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 93 | #750 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 85 | #762 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,005 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,003 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 48 | #994 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,076 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 52 | #803 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 33 | #926 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 41 | #781 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 24 | #877 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 21 | #941 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 21 | #891 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 24 | #792 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 19 | #871 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 19 | #846 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 20 | #825 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,053 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 15 | #900 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,224 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,480 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 15 | #973 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,036 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 14 | #868 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 14 | #873 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,308 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,359 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 10 | #963 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,342 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,031 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,141 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 7 | #944 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 8 | #833 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 8 | #697 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Angelita reached #2,983 in 1934. As a girl name, it reached #578 in 1932. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Angelita
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.