Is Arnulfo a boy or girl name?
Arnulfo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 17 boys were named Arnulfo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 6,287 US babies named Arnulfo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,445
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Arnulfo since 1909
- 6,287
- Most popular year
- 1992
- 119 babies
Boys and girls named Arnulfo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 87 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 303 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 321 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 434 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 673 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 611 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 783 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 860 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 989 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 757 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 364 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 100 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | #5,445 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 25 | #4,230 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 16 | #5,653 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 23 | #4,374 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 19 | #4,869 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 28 | #3,802 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 23 | #4,365 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 37 | #3,130 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 39 | #2,996 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 31 | #3,516 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 39 | #2,934 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 34 | #3,191 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 43 | #2,776 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 48 | #2,548 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 42 | #2,826 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 54 | #2,382 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 65 | #2,104 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 66 | #2,071 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 76 | #1,808 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 72 | #1,803 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 77 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 86 | #1,497 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 84 | #1,498 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 88 | #1,415 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 89 | #1,402 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 84 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 78 | #1,449 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 89 | #1,284 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 105 | #1,127 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 98 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 104 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 111 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 119 | #988 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 103 | #1,071 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 98 | #1,072 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 97 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 79 | #1,125 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 87 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 83 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 86 | #986 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 83 | #976 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 74 | #1,028 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 89 | #951 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 87 | #965 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 95 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 86 | #952 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 75 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 86 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 86 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 85 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 79 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 88 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 62 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 67 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 69 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 88 | #822 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 61 | #930 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 51 | #1,018 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 59 | #942 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 55 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 64 | #952 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 48 | #1,102 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 45 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 60 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 80 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 57 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 63 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 43 | #1,185 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 56 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 65 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 77 | #826 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 79 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 68 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 96 | #707 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 69 | #819 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 93 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 71 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 31 | #1,320 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 42 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 31 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 35 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 38 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 27 | #1,335 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 31 | #1,190 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 35 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 29 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 26 | #1,312 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 34 | #1,121 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 22 | #1,420 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 31 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 26 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 34 | #1,125 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 38 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 26 | #1,363 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 55 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 46 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 41 | #1,097 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 36 | #1,203 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 42 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 27 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 32 | #1,291 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 14 | #2,230 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 22 | #1,651 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 26 | #1,477 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 17 | #1,970 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 21 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 16 | #2,005 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 12 | #2,288 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 21 | #1,552 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 7 | #3,108 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,290 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 5 | #2,846 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Arnulfo reached #707 in 1951. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Arnulfo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.