Is Brantley a boy or girl name?
Brantley is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 6 girls and 640 boys were named Brantley, so 0.9% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 2.5% of the 31,809 US babies named Brantley were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #480
- Girl rank, 2024
- #13,709
- Babies named Brantley since 1893
- 31,809
- Most popular year
- 2014
- 3,399 babies
Boys and girls named Brantley, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 66 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 99 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 109 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 119 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 141 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 177 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 269 | 30 | 10% |
| 1980s | 468 | 56 | 10.7% |
| 1990s | 683 | 113 | 14.2% |
| 2000s | 932 | 176 | 15.9% |
| 2010s | 22,467 | 341 | 1.5% |
| 2020s | 5,477 | 76 | 1.4% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 640 | #480 | 6 | #13,709 |
| 2023 | 889 | #365 | 22 | #5,581 |
| 2022 | 1,067 | #314 | 21 | #5,813 |
| 2021 | 1,302 | #268 | 10 | #9,675 |
| 2020 | 1,579 | #233 | 17 | #6,676 |
| 2019 | 1,666 | #225 | 14 | #7,805 |
| 2018 | 2,107 | #192 | 23 | #5,484 |
| 2017 | 2,338 | #168 | 27 | #4,945 |
| 2016 | 2,614 | #156 | 32 | #4,442 |
| 2015 | 3,306 | #122 | 55 | #3,065 |
| 2014 | 3,353 | #121 | 46 | #3,439 |
| 2013 | 3,193 | #119 | 41 | #3,718 |
| 2012 | 2,588 | #158 | 48 | #3,373 |
| 2011 | 991 | #320 | 27 | #5,088 |
| 2010 | 311 | #736 | 28 | #5,003 |
| 2009 | 137 | #1,279 | 15 | #8,122 |
| 2008 | 99 | #1,594 | 18 | #7,125 |
| 2007 | 99 | #1,578 | 13 | #9,102 |
| 2006 | 94 | #1,564 | 22 | #5,948 |
| 2005 | 94 | #1,514 | 25 | #5,131 |
| 2004 | 76 | #1,688 | 14 | #7,891 |
| 2003 | 94 | #1,410 | 15 | #7,264 |
| 2002 | 67 | #1,723 | 17 | #6,436 |
| 2001 | 86 | #1,443 | 13 | #7,802 |
| 2000 | 86 | #1,431 | 24 | #4,812 |
| 1999 | 72 | #1,546 | 17 | #5,940 |
| 1998 | 75 | #1,477 | 15 | #6,429 |
| 1997 | 85 | #1,327 | 20 | #5,039 |
| 1996 | 66 | #1,517 | 9 | #8,906 |
| 1995 | 64 | #1,492 | 10 | #8,156 |
| 1994 | 73 | #1,363 | 16 | #5,750 |
| 1993 | 67 | #1,421 | 6 | #11,965 |
| 1992 | 56 | #1,575 | 8 | #9,591 |
| 1991 | 62 | #1,444 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 63 | #1,409 | 12 | #6,918 |
| 1989 | 87 | #1,140 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 96 | #987 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 44 | #1,589 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 40 | #1,618 | 8 | #7,830 |
| 1985 | 36 | #1,701 | 8 | #7,639 |
| 1984 | 35 | #1,658 | 9 | #6,868 |
| 1983 | 26 | #2,025 | 6 | #9,148 |
| 1982 | 38 | #1,599 | 10 | #6,409 |
| 1981 | 29 | #1,902 | 6 | #9,249 |
| 1980 | 37 | #1,596 | 9 | #6,846 |
| 1979 | 34 | #1,677 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 36 | #1,572 | 8 | #7,017 |
| 1977 | 28 | #1,828 | 5 | #9,795 |
| 1976 | 15 | #2,718 | 6 | #8,267 |
| 1975 | 30 | #1,661 | 6 | #8,089 |
| 1974 | 31 | #1,588 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 24 | #1,823 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 24 | #1,827 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 23 | #1,870 | 5 | #8,454 |
| 1970 | 24 | #1,802 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 23 | #1,735 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 28 | #1,479 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 8 | #3,016 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 13 | #2,230 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 21 | #1,723 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 15 | #2,128 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 18 | #1,905 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 16 | #2,043 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 16 | #2,072 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 19 | #1,865 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 16 | #2,042 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 24 | #1,600 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 19 | #1,841 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 9 | #2,815 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 9 | #2,789 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 10 | #2,608 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 10 | #2,551 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 17 | #1,866 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 12 | #2,263 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 15 | #1,946 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 12 | #2,236 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 18 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 14 | #2,083 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 9 | #2,557 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 10 | #2,265 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 10 | #2,325 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 12 | #2,188 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 9 | #2,550 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 12 | #2,093 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 13 | #1,992 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 11 | #2,177 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 10 | #2,344 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 10 | #2,341 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 15 | #1,811 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 14 | #1,937 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 8 | #2,768 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 14 | #1,917 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,413 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 10 | #2,498 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 11 | #2,459 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 9 | #2,792 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 5 | #4,225 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 10 | #2,719 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 16 | #1,991 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 13 | #2,324 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,534 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 13 | #2,347 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 7 | #3,571 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 9 | #3,009 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 10 | #2,794 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 8 | #3,141 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 12 | #2,414 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,057 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 8 | #2,958 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 11 | #2,322 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,682 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 9 | #1,763 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 6 | #1,439 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 5 | #1,100 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 5 | #1,056 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Brantley reached #119 in 2013. As a girl name, it reached #3,065 in 2015. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Brantley
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.