Is Kendrick a boy or girl name?
Kendrick is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 5 girls and 641 boys were named Kendrick, so 0.8% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1.1% of the 33,368 US babies named Kendrick were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #478
- Girl rank, 2024
- #16,433
- Babies named Kendrick since 1912
- 33,368
- Most popular year
- 2013
- 1,054 babies
Boys and girls named Kendrick, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 113 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 181 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 126 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 217 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 284 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 711 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 3,924 | 71 | 1.8% |
| 1980s | 5,406 | 91 | 1.7% |
| 1990s | 6,236 | 83 | 1.3% |
| 2000s | 4,850 | 42 | 0.9% |
| 2010s | 7,584 | 64 | 0.8% |
| 2020s | 3,356 | 29 | 0.9% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 641 | #478 | 5 | #16,433 |
| 2023 | 633 | #478 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 664 | #463 | 8 | #11,724 |
| 2021 | 721 | #430 | 9 | #10,694 |
| 2020 | 697 | #425 | 7 | #12,813 |
| 2019 | 721 | #427 | 5 | #16,790 |
| 2018 | 754 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 777 | #407 | 10 | #10,351 |
| 2016 | 829 | #385 | 7 | #13,627 |
| 2015 | 880 | #366 | 7 | #13,750 |
| 2014 | 1,012 | #333 | 10 | #10,550 |
| 2013 | 1,047 | #318 | 7 | #13,916 |
| 2012 | 572 | #477 | 5 | #18,240 |
| 2011 | 492 | #521 | 7 | #14,076 |
| 2010 | 500 | #517 | 6 | #16,002 |
| 2009 | 494 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 520 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 472 | #545 | 5 | #19,083 |
| 2006 | 482 | #528 | 5 | #18,637 |
| 2005 | 433 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 464 | #518 | 8 | #12,198 |
| 2003 | 527 | #476 | 10 | #10,058 |
| 2002 | 469 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 471 | #486 | 8 | #11,531 |
| 2000 | 518 | #459 | 6 | #14,062 |
| 1999 | 554 | #426 | 8 | #10,874 |
| 1998 | 562 | #418 | 5 | #15,339 |
| 1997 | 563 | #412 | 7 | #11,441 |
| 1996 | 569 | #407 | 8 | #10,048 |
| 1995 | 566 | #405 | 5 | #14,557 |
| 1994 | 623 | #376 | 7 | #11,138 |
| 1993 | 631 | #374 | 14 | #6,435 |
| 1992 | 677 | #351 | 8 | #9,938 |
| 1991 | 763 | #329 | 12 | #7,178 |
| 1990 | 728 | #339 | 9 | #8,846 |
| 1989 | 707 | #328 | 7 | #10,244 |
| 1988 | 643 | #335 | 9 | #8,033 |
| 1987 | 640 | #323 | 16 | #4,954 |
| 1986 | 574 | #336 | 12 | #5,949 |
| 1985 | 463 | #386 | 6 | #9,920 |
| 1984 | 469 | #377 | 9 | #7,061 |
| 1983 | 469 | #372 | 7 | #8,474 |
| 1982 | 499 | #359 | 11 | #6,118 |
| 1981 | 472 | #371 | 9 | #7,059 |
| 1980 | 470 | #368 | 5 | #11,172 |
| 1979 | 550 | #332 | 5 | #10,964 |
| 1978 | 494 | #346 | 13 | #5,049 |
| 1977 | 474 | #362 | 11 | #5,673 |
| 1976 | 411 | #380 | 8 | #6,915 |
| 1975 | 366 | #402 | 8 | #6,793 |
| 1974 | 369 | #406 | 5 | #9,395 |
| 1973 | 362 | #411 | 10 | #5,351 |
| 1972 | 302 | #455 | 5 | #8,862 |
| 1971 | 372 | #415 | 6 | #7,820 |
| 1970 | 224 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 126 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 106 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 98 | #746 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 68 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 65 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 63 | #962 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 55 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 42 | #1,207 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 54 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 34 | #1,374 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 36 | #1,312 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 30 | #1,434 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 35 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 29 | #1,466 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 32 | #1,356 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 24 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 25 | #1,536 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 23 | #1,601 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 24 | #1,544 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 26 | #1,452 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 24 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 19 | #1,739 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 23 | #1,577 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 16 | #1,853 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 16 | #1,736 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 20 | #1,556 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 26 | #1,386 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 25 | #1,401 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 27 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 21 | #1,503 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 10 | #2,361 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 19 | #1,590 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,786 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,359 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 19 | #1,629 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 15 | #1,893 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 13 | #2,045 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 16 | #1,887 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 9 | #2,777 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 11 | #2,530 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 21 | #1,647 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 27 | #1,434 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 14 | #2,244 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 10 | #2,811 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,714 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 28 | #1,436 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 8 | #3,318 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 19 | #1,854 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 13 | #2,438 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 20 | #1,793 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 17 | #1,928 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,626 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 19 | #1,728 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 14 | #2,096 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 16 | #1,838 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 17 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 14 | #1,475 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,735 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Kendrick reached #318 in 2013. As a girl name, it reached #4,954 in 1987. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Kendrick
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.