Is Burnice a boy or girl name?
Burnice was used for both boys and girls in close to equal numbers in the US. Across 1880–2024, 54.4% of the 2,926 US babies named Burnice were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Burnice since 1893
- 2,926
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 105 babies
Boys and girls named Burnice, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 21 | 100% |
| 1900s | 27 | 102 | 79.1% |
| 1910s | 247 | 343 | 58.1% |
| 1920s | 356 | 536 | 60.1% |
| 1930s | 234 | 317 | 57.5% |
| 1940s | 199 | 174 | 46.6% |
| 1950s | 145 | 86 | 37.2% |
| 1960s | 67 | 14 | 17.3% |
| 1970s | 47 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 11 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 5 | #6,863 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 6 | #5,607 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 7 | #4,910 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 7 | #4,615 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 6 | #5,003 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 5 | #5,575 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 10 | #3,349 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 5 | #5,196 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 7 | #3,894 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 10 | #2,754 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 6 | #3,603 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 6 | #3,576 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 9 | #2,808 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,084 |
| 1963 | 8 | #3,081 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 9 | #2,870 | 8 | #4,908 |
| 1961 | 10 | #2,734 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 9 | #2,900 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 9 | #2,847 | 5 | #6,353 |
| 1958 | 9 | #2,850 | 8 | #4,552 |
| 1957 | 16 | #2,031 | 7 | #4,962 |
| 1956 | 14 | #2,174 | 9 | #4,197 |
| 1955 | 17 | #1,909 | 10 | #3,807 |
| 1954 | 22 | #1,633 | 7 | #4,718 |
| 1953 | 18 | #1,844 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 15 | #2,016 | 9 | #3,842 |
| 1951 | 13 | #2,148 | 16 | #2,587 |
| 1950 | 12 | #2,226 | 15 | #2,674 |
| 1949 | 28 | #1,387 | 16 | #2,530 |
| 1948 | 16 | #1,890 | 15 | #2,603 |
| 1947 | 26 | #1,453 | 11 | #3,273 |
| 1946 | 22 | #1,516 | 15 | #2,489 |
| 1945 | 17 | #1,635 | 11 | #2,756 |
| 1944 | 22 | #1,444 | 22 | #1,813 |
| 1943 | 17 | #1,780 | 17 | #2,158 |
| 1942 | 17 | #1,741 | 18 | #2,057 |
| 1941 | 14 | #1,918 | 27 | #1,506 |
| 1940 | 20 | #1,525 | 22 | #1,690 |
| 1939 | 27 | #1,275 | 33 | #1,294 |
| 1938 | 24 | #1,370 | 26 | #1,480 |
| 1937 | 23 | #1,409 | 26 | #1,456 |
| 1936 | 18 | #1,592 | 22 | #1,597 |
| 1935 | 34 | #1,128 | 23 | #1,554 |
| 1934 | 28 | #1,273 | 35 | #1,207 |
| 1933 | 21 | #1,505 | 27 | #1,405 |
| 1932 | 23 | #1,470 | 36 | #1,194 |
| 1931 | 16 | #1,858 | 41 | #1,105 |
| 1930 | 20 | #1,648 | 48 | #1,062 |
| 1929 | 29 | #1,314 | 43 | #1,120 |
| 1928 | 30 | #1,327 | 55 | #1,010 |
| 1927 | 33 | #1,273 | 40 | #1,240 |
| 1926 | 29 | #1,355 | 42 | #1,185 |
| 1925 | 32 | #1,284 | 67 | #906 |
| 1924 | 44 | #1,072 | 56 | #1,033 |
| 1923 | 40 | #1,130 | 51 | #1,066 |
| 1922 | 41 | #1,111 | 64 | #917 |
| 1921 | 38 | #1,163 | 58 | #971 |
| 1920 | 40 | #1,122 | 60 | #939 |
| 1919 | 33 | #1,235 | 53 | #986 |
| 1918 | 36 | #1,156 | 49 | #1,033 |
| 1917 | 29 | #1,270 | 45 | #1,055 |
| 1916 | 41 | #1,000 | 46 | #1,013 |
| 1915 | 32 | #1,143 | 43 | #1,014 |
| 1914 | 25 | #1,159 | 27 | #1,182 |
| 1913 | 18 | #1,213 | 25 | #1,095 |
| 1912 | 18 | #1,101 | 22 | #1,123 |
| 1911 | 7 | #1,405 | 19 | #1,009 |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,213 | 14 | #1,217 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,486 |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,405 | 10 | #1,366 |
| 1907 | 10 | #878 | 20 | #844 |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,134 | 10 | #1,235 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,556 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,178 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,625 |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,025 | 10 | #1,140 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,144 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,174 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,635 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,615 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,627 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,298 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Burnice reached #878 in 1907. As a girl name, it reached #844 in 1907. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Burnice
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.