Is Silvio a boy or girl name?
Silvio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 40 boys were named Silvio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,955 US babies named Silvio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,083
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Silvio since 1905
- 2,955
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 86 babies
Boys and girls named Silvio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 24 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 457 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 641 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 265 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 167 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 162 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 178 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 133 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 173 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 164 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 233 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 216 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 142 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40 | #3,083 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 32 | #3,615 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 28 | #3,972 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 28 | #3,899 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 14 | #6,241 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 27 | #3,981 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 20 | #4,894 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 32 | #3,507 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 29 | #3,762 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 22 | #4,525 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 13 | #6,572 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 21 | #4,595 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 16 | #5,686 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 21 | #4,631 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 15 | #5,994 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 25 | #4,143 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 28 | #3,813 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 27 | #3,876 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 20 | #4,651 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 20 | #4,438 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 19 | #4,573 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 23 | #3,826 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 21 | #4,022 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 24 | #3,604 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 26 | #3,287 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 17 | #4,312 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 13 | #5,121 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 18 | #3,858 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 16 | #4,161 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 18 | #3,672 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 20 | #3,448 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 9 | #6,156 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 15 | #4,074 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 17 | #3,610 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 21 | #3,046 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 26 | #2,535 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 18 | #3,058 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 16 | #3,181 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 16 | #3,110 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 20 | #2,587 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 11 | #3,899 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 17 | #2,777 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 12 | #3,657 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 15 | #3,007 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 22 | #2,356 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 9 | #4,350 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 12 | #3,374 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 10 | #3,803 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 8 | #4,366 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 14 | #2,884 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 14 | #2,780 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 16 | #2,499 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 20 | #2,069 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 17 | #2,357 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 13 | #2,722 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 12 | #2,666 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 15 | #2,186 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 23 | #1,647 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 18 | #1,883 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 18 | #1,908 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 14 | #2,301 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 24 | #1,658 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 14 | #2,266 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 25 | #1,628 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 15 | #2,197 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 12 | #2,515 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 17 | #2,011 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 19 | #1,882 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 8 | #3,174 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 20 | #1,783 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 23 | #1,622 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 13 | #2,273 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 19 | #1,799 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 17 | #1,897 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 14 | #2,102 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 18 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 16 | #1,937 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 26 | #1,474 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 13 | #2,131 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 10 | #2,378 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 14 | #1,972 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 18 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 16 | #1,855 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 16 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 20 | #1,562 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 26 | #1,319 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 11 | #2,309 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 13 | #2,079 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 26 | #1,319 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 19 | #1,648 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 22 | #1,492 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 23 | #1,448 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 32 | #1,214 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 39 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 54 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 40 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 48 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 49 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 58 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 69 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 82 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 77 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 86 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 60 | #907 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 72 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 41 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 65 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 78 | #686 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 71 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 67 | #731 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 41 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 44 | #692 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 25 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 19 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 6 | #1,562 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 10 | #1,013 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 9 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,406 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Silvio reached #686 in 1917. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Silvio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.