Is Wyman a boy or girl name?
Wyman was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 3,066 US babies named Wyman were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #10,827
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Wyman since 1898
- 3,066
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 63 babies
Boys and girls named Wyman, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 40 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 255 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 479 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 404 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 443 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 463 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 313 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 221 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 135 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 116 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 73 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 35 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7 | #10,827 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 6 | #12,167 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 7 | #10,786 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 8 | #9,650 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 7 | #10,545 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 11 | #7,610 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 5 | #13,991 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 10 | #8,109 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 9 | #8,773 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 9 | #8,712 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 5 | #13,974 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 7 | #10,675 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 6 | #12,205 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 6 | #12,218 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 5 | #14,163 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,670 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 5 | #14,521 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 8 | #9,751 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,691 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 6 | #11,419 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 9 | #8,122 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 14 | #5,545 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 6 | #10,622 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 8 | #8,311 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 8 | #8,179 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 5 | #11,558 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 14 | #4,863 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 11 | #5,634 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 17 | #4,013 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 15 | #4,269 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 8 | #6,955 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 9 | #6,205 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 12 | #4,859 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 5 | #9,612 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 20 | #3,164 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 13 | #4,266 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 11 | #4,439 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 13 | #3,723 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 9 | #4,843 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 13 | #3,588 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 18 | #2,703 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 9 | #4,491 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 18 | #2,707 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 15 | #3,025 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 16 | #2,962 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 11 | #3,808 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 14 | #3,068 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 22 | #2,201 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 26 | #1,930 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 27 | #1,834 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 19 | #2,276 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 22 | #1,979 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 23 | #1,927 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 32 | #1,559 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 25 | #1,793 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 28 | #1,569 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 24 | #1,648 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 30 | #1,411 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 25 | #1,580 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 29 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 39 | #1,262 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 32 | #1,402 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 36 | #1,310 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 34 | #1,387 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 36 | #1,340 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 43 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 44 | #1,171 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 35 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 51 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 45 | #1,113 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 41 | #1,185 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 57 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 52 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 46 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 49 | #1,005 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 47 | #1,028 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 41 | #1,126 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 52 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 43 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 42 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 46 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 43 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 45 | #1,006 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 49 | #917 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 35 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 32 | #1,167 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 41 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 35 | #1,118 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 42 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 46 | #939 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 42 | #1,006 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 40 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 47 | #962 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 50 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 29 | #1,366 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 36 | #1,172 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 37 | #1,187 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 42 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 41 | #1,123 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 45 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 54 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 53 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 63 | #870 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 61 | #900 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 47 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 45 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 33 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 37 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 41 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 25 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 24 | #1,220 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 10 | #1,943 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 14 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 21 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 5 | #1,837 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 10 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 9 | #1,020 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,546 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 5 | #1,412 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,202 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 5 | #1,288 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Wyman reached #706 in 1911. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Wyman
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.