Is Cleon a boy or girl name?
Cleon was mostly a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 5.9% of the 3,182 US babies named Cleon were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #9,123
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Cleon since 1884
- 3,182
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 86 babies
Boys and girls named Cleon, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 23 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 59 | 10 | 14.5% |
| 1910s | 342 | 59 | 14.7% |
| 1920s | 565 | 69 | 10.9% |
| 1930s | 450 | 46 | 9.3% |
| 1940s | 311 | 5 | 1.6% |
| 1950s | 257 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 225 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 323 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 134 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 123 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 69 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 62 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 34 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8 | #9,123 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 9 | #8,376 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 10 | #7,865 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 7 | #9,920 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 5 | #12,519 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 5 | #12,528 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 10 | #7,700 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 11 | #7,158 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 7 | #9,831 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 5 | #12,490 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 10 | #7,604 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 9 | #8,268 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 6 | #11,253 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 5 | #12,701 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 6 | #10,917 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 11 | #6,717 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 8 | #8,268 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 6 | #9,792 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 14 | #5,179 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 7 | #8,468 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 6 | #9,291 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 11 | #5,720 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 8 | #6,965 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 12 | #5,006 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 7 | #7,269 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 20 | #3,328 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 6 | #7,946 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 20 | #3,260 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 15 | #3,948 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 6 | #7,431 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 18 | #3,333 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 13 | #4,064 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 11 | #4,212 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 14 | #3,366 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 16 | #3,022 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 15 | #3,096 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 9 | #4,266 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 9 | #4,192 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 20 | #2,440 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 14 | #3,060 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 13 | #3,286 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 18 | #2,598 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 19 | #2,389 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 17 | #2,576 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 34 | #1,577 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 43 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 37 | #1,414 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 27 | #1,701 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 28 | #1,654 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 40 | #1,332 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 60 | #1,055 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 52 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 27 | #1,511 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 17 | #1,918 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 29 | #1,430 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 17 | #1,931 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 13 | #2,326 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 22 | #1,704 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 19 | #1,863 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 14 | #2,254 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 15 | #2,141 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 23 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 24 | #1,601 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 24 | #1,640 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 32 | #1,364 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 26 | #1,510 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 25 | #1,532 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 25 | #1,521 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 22 | #1,627 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 28 | #1,413 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 28 | #1,369 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 21 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 32 | #1,281 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 37 | #1,191 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 28 | #1,331 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 29 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 24 | #1,372 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 41 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 31 | #1,249 | 5 | #4,740 |
| 1941 | 36 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 32 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 38 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 43 | #967 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 37 | #1,058 | 5 | #4,364 |
| 1936 | 46 | #907 | 8 | #3,153 |
| 1935 | 32 | #1,169 | 5 | #4,322 |
| 1934 | 54 | #855 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 44 | #948 | 6 | #3,822 |
| 1932 | 52 | #892 | 5 | #4,526 |
| 1931 | 49 | #925 | 9 | #3,018 |
| 1930 | 55 | #894 | 8 | #3,400 |
| 1929 | 50 | #953 | 8 | #3,452 |
| 1928 | 56 | #891 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 44 | #1,060 | 10 | #3,099 |
| 1926 | 41 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 66 | #817 | 10 | #3,152 |
| 1924 | 64 | #859 | 8 | #3,718 |
| 1923 | 50 | #981 | 11 | #2,953 |
| 1922 | 62 | #871 | 6 | #4,549 |
| 1921 | 75 | #774 | 11 | #2,974 |
| 1920 | 57 | #915 | 5 | #5,116 |
| 1919 | 60 | #852 | 11 | #2,847 |
| 1918 | 52 | #920 | 9 | #3,290 |
| 1917 | 45 | #966 | 11 | #2,729 |
| 1916 | 40 | #1,016 | 6 | #4,011 |
| 1915 | 39 | #1,022 | 5 | #4,408 |
| 1914 | 38 | #885 | 7 | #2,947 |
| 1913 | 31 | #877 | 5 | #3,280 |
| 1912 | 19 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 12 | #994 | 5 | #2,540 |
| 1910 | 6 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 8 | #1,099 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 11 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,379 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,006 |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,124 | 5 | #1,996 |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,239 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 12 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,175 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 7 | #872 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 6 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,128 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 6 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 5 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 5 | #965 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 6 | #875 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Cleon reached #662 in 1903. As a girl name, it reached #1,996 in 1905. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Cleon
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.