Is Blossom a boy or girl name?
Blossom is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 101 girls and 0 boys were named Blossom, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,248 US babies named Blossom were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,952
- Babies named Blossom since 1882
- 3,248
- Most popular year
- 1925
- 102 babies
Boys and girls named Blossom, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 69 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 113 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 292 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 743 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 286 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 134 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 132 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 87 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 147 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 172 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 167 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 382 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 407 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,952 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,090 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 78 | #2,365 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,488 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,601 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,632 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,211 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,926 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,792 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,712 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,118 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,259 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,140 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,163 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,635 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,811 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,847 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,602 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,542 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,464 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,454 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,263 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,745 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,111 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,855 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,881 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,257 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,918 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,653 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,988 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,278 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,689 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,252 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,217 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 10 | #7,945 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,794 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,480 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,972 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,828 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,514 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,760 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,302 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,737 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,377 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,845 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,115 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,959 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,385 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,690 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,066 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,053 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,384 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,556 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,470 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,056 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,796 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,185 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,505 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,315 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,330 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,860 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,041 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,561 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,928 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,940 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,050 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,242 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,158 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,717 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,848 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,507 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,831 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,682 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,952 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,070 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,277 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,156 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,778 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,893 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,159 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,963 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,265 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,835 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,414 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,438 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,131 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,758 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,455 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,410 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,272 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,609 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,203 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,323 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 51 | #976 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,076 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,004 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,009 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 62 | #965 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 84 | #790 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 102 | #727 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 82 | #822 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 83 | #796 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 84 | #796 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 77 | #846 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 62 | #921 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,248 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,001 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,129 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,538 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,121 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,181 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,093 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,149 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,676 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 20 | #976 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 23 | #847 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,452 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,212 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 15 | #969 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,315 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,175 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 13 | #979 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,630 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,236 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,334 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,418 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,385 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,403 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,004 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 12 | #936 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,006 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,183 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,355 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,353 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,047 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 5 | #927 |
Highest rank
Blossom has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #727 in 1925. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.