Is Freeda a boy or girl name?
Freeda was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,067 US babies named Freeda were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #16,032
- Babies named Freeda since 1891
- 3,067
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 99 babies
Boys and girls named Freeda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 103 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 217 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 543 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 884 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 558 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 374 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 186 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 67 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 21 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 36 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 16 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,032 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,144 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,373 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,226 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,649 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,503 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,688 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,837 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,757 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,862 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,618 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,179 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,456 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,356 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,792 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,761 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,402 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,429 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,576 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,683 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,835 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,365 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,115 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,032 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,838 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,250 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,355 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,648 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,477 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,565 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,686 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,029 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,753 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,485 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,874 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,327 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,545 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,903 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,206 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,205 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,821 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,795 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,675 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,632 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,492 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,262 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,376 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,129 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 59 | #958 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,136 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,187 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,167 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,024 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,011 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 58 | #906 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 57 | #910 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 59 | #883 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 55 | #959 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 75 | #780 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 82 | #777 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 79 | #791 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 73 | #848 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 86 | #783 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 96 | #740 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 91 | #776 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 99 | #745 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 96 | #749 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 96 | #745 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 80 | #826 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 88 | #774 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 90 | #741 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 69 | #864 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 67 | #836 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 74 | #792 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 60 | #841 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 49 | #844 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 47 | #767 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 45 | #750 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 20 | #993 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 22 | #925 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 23 | #853 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 28 | #734 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 26 | #743 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 20 | #824 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 24 | #747 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 22 | #762 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 16 | #873 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 24 | #696 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 18 | #780 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 16 | #950 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 19 | #737 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,304 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 12 | #944 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 16 | #820 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 12 | #954 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 13 | #871 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,221 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 11 | #927 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,396 |
Highest rank
Freeda has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #696 in 1902. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Freeda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.