Is Freda a boy or girl name?
Freda is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 20 girls and 0 boys were named Freda, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 42,533 US babies named Freda were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #6,000
- Babies named Freda since 1880
- 42,533
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 1,025 babies
Boys and girls named Freda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 624 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 2,289 | 100% |
| 1900s | 5 | 2,932 | 99.8% |
| 1910s | 5 | 7,453 | 99.9% |
| 1920s | 0 | 8,632 | 100% |
| 1930s | 5 | 5,819 | 99.9% |
| 1940s | 11 | 4,792 | 99.8% |
| 1950s | 0 | 4,777 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,732 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,328 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 545 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 209 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 167 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 130 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 78 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,000 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,032 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,703 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,649 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,428 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,517 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,797 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,370 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,134 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,753 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,157 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,691 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,353 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,885 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,791 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,521 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 10 | #11,101 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,609 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,634 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,191 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,585 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,228 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,250 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,721 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,948 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,653 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,563 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,608 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,777 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,736 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,141 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,126 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,243 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,652 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,278 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,941 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,659 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,353 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,185 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,927 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,166 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,572 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,365 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,304 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,401 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,150 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,120 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,107 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 132 | #954 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 127 | #970 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 161 | #816 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 169 | #800 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 172 | #809 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 145 | #906 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 137 | #906 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 150 | #831 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 161 | #782 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 193 | #706 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 263 | #589 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 275 | #604 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 318 | #543 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 342 | #528 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 444 | #465 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 449 | #462 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 459 | #450 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 461 | #443 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 493 | #421 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 527 | #391 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 507 | #391 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 476 | #398 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 521 | #372 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 430 | #402 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 466 | #379 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 437 | #388 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 413 | #389 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 469 | #363 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 501 | #360 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 471 | #349 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 438 | #330 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 467 | #313 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 552 | #296 |
| 1942 | 6 | #3,341 | 503 | #307 |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,688 | 491 | #292 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 487 | #284 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 538 | #266 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 543 | #270 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 528 | #272 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 495 | #273 |
| 1935 | 5 | #3,851 | 623 | #251 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 651 | #243 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 588 | #251 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 603 | #255 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 640 | #237 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 610 | #253 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 696 | #227 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 748 | #229 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 819 | #222 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 830 | #221 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 889 | #217 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 914 | #213 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 868 | #219 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 924 | #211 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 970 | #208 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 974 | #201 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,401 | 900 | #206 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 1,025 | #192 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 1,010 | #188 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 948 | #188 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 944 | #176 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 689 | #194 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 613 | #185 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 566 | #173 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 413 | #177 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 345 | #193 |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,539 | 321 | #186 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 349 | #171 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 306 | #182 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 287 | #177 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 310 | #170 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 256 | #187 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 280 | #174 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 247 | #185 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 255 | #173 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 321 | #170 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 266 | #167 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 273 | #172 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 279 | #161 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 246 | #175 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 250 | #167 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 227 | #178 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 231 | #167 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 229 | #165 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 161 | #186 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 127 | #215 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 112 | #219 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 95 | #237 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 80 | #238 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 66 | #255 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 67 | #248 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 61 | #248 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 33 | #307 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 42 | #269 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 34 | #276 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 34 | #265 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Freda reached #1,539 in 1909. As a girl name, it reached #161 in 1897. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Freda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.