Is Lizzie a boy or girl name?
Lizzie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 79 girls and 0 boys were named Lizzie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.7% of the 39,537 US babies named Lizzie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,332
- Babies named Lizzie since 1880
- 39,537
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 814 babies
Boys and girls named Lizzie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 5,035 | 99.9% |
| 1890s | 6 | 5,556 | 99.9% |
| 1900s | 12 | 4,824 | 99.8% |
| 1910s | 17 | 6,085 | 99.7% |
| 1920s | 46 | 5,969 | 99.2% |
| 1930s | 11 | 3,684 | 99.7% |
| 1940s | 5 | 2,849 | 99.8% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,765 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 844 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 466 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 367 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 326 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 666 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 603 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 396 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,332 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,071 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,457 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 83 | #2,242 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,588 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,554 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,821 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,731 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,531 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,605 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,705 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,861 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,888 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,932 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,393 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 57 | #3,029 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,406 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,528 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,451 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 83 | #2,218 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 78 | #2,254 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,810 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,180 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,862 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,927 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,286 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,463 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,861 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,128 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,296 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,017 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,056 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,461 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,965 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,047 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,845 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,473 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,945 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,760 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,517 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,111 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,256 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,435 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,143 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,915 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,326 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,372 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,199 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,984 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,682 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,089 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,794 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,908 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,703 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,646 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,537 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,383 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,448 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,376 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,181 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,070 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,019 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,229 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,087 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 115 | #1,003 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 122 | #955 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 127 | #913 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 127 | #905 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 151 | #810 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 180 | #703 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 205 | #642 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 180 | #672 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 202 | #617 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 227 | #565 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 244 | #529 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 247 | #523 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 279 | #480 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 273 | #498 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 291 | #456 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 263 | #440 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 265 | #444 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 294 | #429 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 298 | #415 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 349 | #354 |
| 1940 | 5 | #3,740 | 290 | #400 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 284 | #396 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 295 | #391 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 316 | #364 |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,385 | 310 | #360 |
| 1935 | 5 | #3,948 | 401 | #308 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 357 | #332 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 405 | #308 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 416 | #313 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 406 | #317 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 494 | #298 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 487 | #298 |
| 1928 | 5 | #4,488 | 475 | #304 |
| 1927 | 8 | #3,327 | 562 | #282 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 543 | #284 |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,624 | 636 | #263 |
| 1924 | 6 | #4,149 | 581 | #270 |
| 1923 | 7 | #3,677 | 625 | #256 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 684 | #251 |
| 1921 | 8 | #3,380 | 665 | #257 |
| 1920 | 7 | #3,685 | 711 | #245 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,534 | 809 | #219 |
| 1918 | 7 | #3,569 | 727 | #236 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 646 | #244 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 669 | #239 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 657 | #236 |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,547 | 551 | #228 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 532 | #201 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 548 | #180 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 441 | #170 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 505 | #155 |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,224 | 504 | #140 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 436 | #155 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 462 | #142 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 449 | #136 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 476 | #133 |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,319 | 420 | #139 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 458 | #124 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 504 | #115 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 458 | #115 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 657 | #103 |
| 1899 | 6 | #1,000 | 492 | #105 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 582 | #103 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 543 | #99 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 508 | #100 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 543 | #99 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 562 | #92 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 584 | #83 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 597 | #80 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 525 | #82 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 620 | #74 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 570 | #74 |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,118 | 593 | #75 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 525 | #68 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 512 | #71 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 537 | #65 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 523 | #66 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 496 | #63 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 495 | #62 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 396 | #67 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 388 | #67 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lizzie reached #1,000 in 1899. As a girl name, it reached #62 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.