Is Woodrow a boy or girl name?
Woodrow is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 99 boys were named Woodrow, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.4% of the 39,144 US babies named Woodrow were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,694
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Woodrow since 1900
- 39,144
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 3,372 babies
Boys and girls named Woodrow, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 72 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 18,355 | 86 | 0.5% |
| 1920s | 4,542 | 30 | 0.7% |
| 1930s | 2,920 | 12 | 0.4% |
| 1940s | 4,761 | 5 | 0.1% |
| 1950s | 2,808 | 6 | 0.2% |
| 1960s | 1,785 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,149 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 742 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 557 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 284 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 576 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 454 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99 | #1,694 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 84 | #1,894 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 88 | #1,837 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 92 | #1,762 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 91 | #1,715 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 78 | #1,915 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 81 | #1,870 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 73 | #1,975 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 77 | #1,917 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 59 | #2,271 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 57 | #2,315 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 33 | #3,335 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 35 | #3,227 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 39 | #2,998 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 44 | #2,785 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 29 | #3,716 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 33 | #3,416 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 27 | #3,887 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 19 | #4,854 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 32 | #3,239 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 29 | #3,366 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 36 | #2,776 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 32 | #2,940 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 24 | #3,614 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 23 | #3,634 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 39 | #2,343 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 40 | #2,271 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 64 | #1,598 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 54 | #1,738 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 39 | #2,138 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 50 | #1,772 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 62 | #1,512 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 71 | #1,350 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 70 | #1,358 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 68 | #1,360 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 73 | #1,280 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 64 | #1,295 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 50 | #1,466 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 77 | #1,066 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 64 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 62 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 86 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 88 | #964 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 84 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 94 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 97 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 94 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 109 | #818 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 105 | #819 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 100 | #835 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 97 | #819 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 120 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 136 | #687 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 144 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 147 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 156 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 148 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 154 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 148 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 168 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 196 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 191 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 201 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 215 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 208 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 180 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 215 | #525 | 6 | #6,092 |
| 1957 | 239 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 233 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 283 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 305 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 303 | #401 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 354 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 362 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 334 | #371 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 388 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 428 | #324 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 485 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 470 | #299 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 503 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 524 | #255 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 559 | #251 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 480 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 481 | #255 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 443 | #267 | 5 | #5,013 |
| 1939 | 424 | #264 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 405 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 357 | #286 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 282 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 272 | #330 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 217 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 222 | #364 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 293 | #323 | 5 | #5,087 |
| 1931 | 236 | #367 | 7 | #3,843 |
| 1930 | 212 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 213 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 230 | #391 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 338 | #312 | 5 | #5,593 |
| 1926 | 306 | #330 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 375 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 516 | #254 | 5 | #5,883 |
| 1923 | 484 | #253 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 622 | #211 | 9 | #3,652 |
| 1921 | 684 | #201 | 6 | #5,093 |
| 1920 | 774 | #183 | 5 | #5,751 |
| 1919 | 1,808 | #91 | 15 | #2,383 |
| 1918 | 3,358 | #58 | 14 | #2,515 |
| 1917 | 2,428 | #73 | 11 | #2,873 |
| 1916 | 2,668 | #64 | 11 | #2,828 |
| 1915 | 1,966 | #83 | 8 | #3,427 |
| 1914 | 1,785 | #71 | 6 | #3,604 |
| 1913 | 2,333 | #44 | 10 | #2,159 |
| 1912 | 1,843 | #46 | 11 | #1,839 |
| 1911 | 121 | #234 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 45 | #395 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 24 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 17 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 11 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,110 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,316 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,046 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Woodrow reached #44 in 1913. As a girl name, it reached #1,839 in 1912. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Woodrow
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.