Is Irving a boy or girl name?
Irving is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 105 boys were named Irving, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 44,358 US babies named Irving were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,617
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Irving since 1880
- 44,358
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 1,538 babies
Boys and girls named Irving, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 654 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 903 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 1,524 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 10,737 | 15 | 0.1% |
| 1920s | 11,898 | 62 | 0.5% |
| 1930s | 4,239 | 8 | 0.2% |
| 1940s | 2,933 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 2,403 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,466 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 883 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,204 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,928 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,769 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,240 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 492 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 105 | #1,617 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 97 | #1,719 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 104 | #1,657 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 94 | #1,731 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 92 | #1,699 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 120 | #1,456 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 123 | #1,423 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 141 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 139 | #1,307 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 100 | #1,605 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 113 | #1,448 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 129 | #1,331 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 115 | #1,442 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 121 | #1,378 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 139 | #1,259 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 139 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 159 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 179 | #1,051 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 181 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 176 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 183 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 214 | #817 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 187 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 160 | #962 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 191 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 140 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 127 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 131 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 152 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 165 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 211 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 187 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 255 | #645 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 340 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 220 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 222 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 304 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 109 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 84 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 73 | #1,085 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 74 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 82 | #974 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 77 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 88 | #964 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 91 | #940 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 82 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 79 | #973 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 71 | #1,021 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 77 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 82 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 69 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 86 | #856 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 102 | #793 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 103 | #793 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 132 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 114 | #733 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 122 | #681 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 133 | #649 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 121 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 111 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 139 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 158 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 170 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 197 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 201 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 174 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 207 | #534 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 228 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 219 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 247 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 248 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 243 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 253 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 286 | #403 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 298 | #391 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 283 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 290 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 320 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 277 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 266 | #364 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 267 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 325 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 296 | #355 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 317 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 292 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 322 | #310 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 322 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 338 | #292 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 340 | #293 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 353 | #288 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 422 | #264 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 408 | #260 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 508 | #237 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 583 | #215 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 643 | #207 | 8 | #3,486 |
| 1929 | 754 | #185 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 879 | #166 | 10 | #3,036 |
| 1927 | 1,021 | #155 | 7 | #4,042 |
| 1926 | 1,159 | #144 | 5 | #5,206 |
| 1925 | 1,174 | #141 | 8 | #3,844 |
| 1924 | 1,260 | #137 | 5 | #5,432 |
| 1923 | 1,384 | #124 | 7 | #4,159 |
| 1922 | 1,365 | #124 | 8 | #3,819 |
| 1921 | 1,417 | #124 | 5 | #5,476 |
| 1920 | 1,485 | #116 | 7 | #4,169 |
| 1919 | 1,440 | #111 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 1,533 | #108 | 5 | #5,169 |
| 1917 | 1,470 | #106 | 5 | #4,919 |
| 1916 | 1,373 | #109 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 1,385 | #107 | 5 | #4,587 |
| 1914 | 1,156 | #100 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 862 | #104 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 815 | #94 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 431 | #93 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 272 | #118 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 202 | #134 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 225 | #114 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 196 | #124 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 170 | #125 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 148 | #142 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 159 | #133 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 125 | #149 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 104 | #168 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 80 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 115 | #185 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 95 | #158 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 113 | #150 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 98 | #158 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 87 | #188 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 110 | #140 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 102 | #151 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 95 | #155 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 59 | #229 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 75 | #173 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 69 | #193 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 65 | #201 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 89 | #170 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 55 | #208 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 60 | #219 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 78 | #170 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 80 | #176 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 46 | #233 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 61 | #208 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 60 | #192 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 60 | #203 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Irving reached #93 in 1911. As a girl name, it reached #3,036 in 1928. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Irving
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.