Is Cleopatra a boy or girl name?
Cleopatra is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 45 girls and 0 boys were named Cleopatra, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,441 US babies named Cleopatra were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,450
- Babies named Cleopatra since 1889
- 2,441
- Most popular year
- 1974
- 52 babies
Boys and girls named Cleopatra, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 39 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 61 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 221 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 340 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 210 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 134 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 130 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 88 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 239 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 158 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 190 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 169 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 244 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 212 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,450 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,995 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,132 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,948 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,628 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,678 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,090 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,719 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,029 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,698 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,775 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,064 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,306 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,984 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,363 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,859 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,613 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,463 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,644 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,070 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,155 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,680 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,407 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,413 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,901 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,586 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,180 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,260 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,469 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,626 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,715 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,864 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,886 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,723 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,885 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,709 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,198 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,118 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,016 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,668 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,001 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,931 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,268 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,184 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,293 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,163 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,877 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,291 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,204 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,416 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,738 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,231 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,558 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,557 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,215 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,771 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,540 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,561 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,920 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,371 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,909 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,838 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,311 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,502 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,697 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,580 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,973 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,526 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,614 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,354 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,373 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,696 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,963 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,199 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,036 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,078 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,292 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,902 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,948 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,174 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,462 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,440 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,422 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,001 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,192 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,764 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,930 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,887 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,672 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,715 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,371 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,243 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,261 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,713 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,345 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,182 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,128 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,841 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,758 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,687 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,395 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,474 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,207 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,156 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,136 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,417 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,347 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,816 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,896 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,451 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,691 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,365 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,080 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,077 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,273 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,148 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,220 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,439 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,997 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,941 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,466 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,474 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,650 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,538 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,598 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,313 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,475 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,494 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,239 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,168 |
Highest rank
Cleopatra has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,077 in 1910. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Cleopatra
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.