Is Neville a boy or girl name?
Neville was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 3.1% of the 2,405 US babies named Neville were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #10,563
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Neville since 1905
- 2,405
- Most popular year
- 1975
- 42 babies
Boys and girls named Neville, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 17 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 145 | 27 | 15.7% |
| 1920s | 225 | 35 | 13.5% |
| 1930s | 233 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 159 | 13 | 7.6% |
| 1950s | 199 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 239 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 273 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 268 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 247 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 135 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 143 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 47 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7 | #10,563 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 11 | #7,593 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 9 | #8,633 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 20 | #4,807 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 19 | #5,100 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 10 | #7,992 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 13 | #6,560 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 17 | #5,479 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 17 | #5,451 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,395 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 14 | #6,148 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 19 | #4,984 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 8 | #9,359 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 15 | #5,950 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,558 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 9 | #8,801 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 15 | #5,834 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,532 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 18 | #4,769 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 17 | #4,944 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 14 | #5,469 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 16 | #4,848 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 11 | #6,312 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 15 | #4,977 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 19 | #3,936 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 16 | #4,346 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 20 | #3,551 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 25 | #2,999 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 18 | #3,658 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 26 | #2,824 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 26 | #2,756 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 31 | #2,393 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 36 | #2,084 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 30 | #2,355 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 25 | #2,590 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 28 | #2,232 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 29 | #2,098 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 22 | #2,482 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 19 | #2,673 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 37 | #1,623 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 28 | #1,939 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 26 | #2,096 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 22 | #2,311 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 32 | #1,791 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 23 | #2,215 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 17 | #2,632 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 27 | #1,891 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 28 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 42 | #1,355 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 27 | #1,775 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 19 | #2,189 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 26 | #1,755 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 33 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 31 | #1,539 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 24 | #1,710 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 17 | #2,009 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 24 | #1,594 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 25 | #1,567 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 22 | #1,704 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 35 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 27 | #1,534 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 20 | #1,840 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 21 | #1,808 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 24 | #1,677 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 25 | #1,614 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 25 | #1,580 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 18 | #1,930 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 20 | #1,800 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 20 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 16 | #2,022 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 19 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 19 | #1,788 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 19 | #1,763 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 18 | #1,791 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 18 | #1,804 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 15 | #2,000 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 12 | #2,326 | 6 | #5,139 |
| 1946 | 18 | #1,734 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 9 | #2,525 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 12 | #2,162 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 13 | #2,146 | 7 | #4,089 |
| 1942 | 22 | #1,520 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 19 | #1,628 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 21 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 23 | #1,415 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 28 | #1,270 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 25 | #1,364 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 22 | #1,448 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 11 | #2,352 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 17 | #1,770 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 41 | #1,009 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 21 | #1,570 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 19 | #1,679 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 26 | #1,452 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 21 | #1,654 | 5 | #5,090 |
| 1928 | 23 | #1,594 | 5 | #5,234 |
| 1927 | 26 | #1,500 | 7 | #4,167 |
| 1926 | 26 | #1,453 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 19 | #1,852 | 13 | #2,731 |
| 1924 | 16 | #2,107 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 25 | #1,538 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 26 | #1,494 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 24 | #1,575 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 19 | #1,861 | 5 | #5,552 |
| 1919 | 24 | #1,520 | 5 | #5,357 |
| 1918 | 27 | #1,395 | 6 | #4,669 |
| 1917 | 18 | #1,792 | 5 | #5,108 |
| 1916 | 25 | #1,403 | 6 | #4,271 |
| 1915 | 11 | #2,404 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 21 | #1,333 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,214 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,470 | 5 | #3,308 |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,928 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 10 | #1,003 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 7 | #1,058 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Neville reached #1,003 in 1909. As a girl name, it reached #2,731 in 1925. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Neville
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.