Is Camelia a boy or girl name?
Camelia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 46 girls and 0 boys were named Camelia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,902 US babies named Camelia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,392
- Babies named Camelia since 1884
- 2,902
- Most popular year
- 1987
- 71 babies
Boys and girls named Camelia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 18 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 65 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 74 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 95 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 211 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 275 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 313 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 356 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 400 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 234 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 262 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 352 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 225 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,392 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,713 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,079 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,176 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,096 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,511 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,867 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,969 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,006 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,004 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,442 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,681 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,989 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,979 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,013 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,148 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,169 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,711 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,942 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,844 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,728 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,888 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,794 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,585 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,999 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,323 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,657 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,855 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,615 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,991 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,802 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,413 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,104 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,357 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,374 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,488 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,704 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,702 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,855 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,949 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,231 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,990 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,374 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,413 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,253 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,483 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,871 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,777 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,538 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,914 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,019 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,836 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,910 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,668 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,865 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,527 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,303 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,121 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,064 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,001 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,014 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,430 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,035 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,958 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,984 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,722 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,329 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,285 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,462 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,114 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,682 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,436 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,863 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,025 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,730 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,018 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,624 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,903 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,755 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,832 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,814 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,670 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,432 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,818 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,317 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,133 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,964 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,330 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,275 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,187 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,367 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,140 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,313 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,416 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,708 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,130 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,724 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,933 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,712 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,437 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,946 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,185 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,550 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,085 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,507 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,551 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,215 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,305 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,176 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,027 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,877 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,992 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,557 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,825 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,387 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,516 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,129 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,050 |
Highest rank
Camelia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,050 in 1884. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Camelia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.