Is Celia a boy or girl name?
Celia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 382 girls and 0 boys were named Celia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 56,363 US babies named Celia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #734
- Babies named Celia since 1880
- 56,363
- Most popular year
- 1915
- 853 babies
Boys and girls named Celia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 1,363 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 2,373 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 2,971 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 6,559 | 100% |
| 1920s | 18 | 6,352 | 99.7% |
| 1930s | 41 | 4,349 | 99.1% |
| 1940s | 0 | 4,231 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 5,600 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 3,882 | 100% |
| 1970s | 5 | 2,442 | 99.8% |
| 1980s | 10 | 3,476 | 99.7% |
| 1990s | 0 | 3,540 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 3,986 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 3,425 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,740 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 382 | #734 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 332 | #827 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 323 | #861 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 358 | #791 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 345 | #790 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 308 | #868 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 287 | #931 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 324 | #838 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 344 | #835 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 328 | #851 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 356 | #787 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 355 | #768 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 376 | #739 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 372 | #741 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 375 | #744 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 376 | #755 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 390 | #756 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 370 | #779 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 406 | #699 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 410 | #678 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 406 | #676 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 406 | #653 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 388 | #652 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 424 | #594 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 410 | #619 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 409 | #597 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 384 | #619 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 361 | #619 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 336 | #662 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 318 | #669 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 303 | #692 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 343 | #651 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 343 | #650 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 352 | #635 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 391 | #589 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 310 | #659 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 342 | #590 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 330 | #590 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 358 | #561 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 406 | #500 |
| 1984 | 5 | #6,459 | 502 | #424 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 399 | #492 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 258 | #681 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 294 | #617 |
| 1980 | 5 | #6,391 | 277 | #656 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 247 | #690 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 218 | #724 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 245 | #655 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 209 | #705 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 206 | #717 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 233 | #654 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 233 | #645 |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,092 | 216 | #684 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 278 | #612 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 357 | #531 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 237 | #644 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 265 | #589 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 270 | #581 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 302 | #541 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 357 | #503 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 377 | #502 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 447 | #461 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 555 | #414 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 532 | #426 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 540 | #416 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 536 | #407 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 530 | #401 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 519 | #405 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 560 | #372 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 604 | #350 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 548 | #374 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 579 | #349 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 639 | #320 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 578 | #329 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 507 | #351 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 498 | #349 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 489 | #351 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 456 | #375 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 402 | #380 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 377 | #357 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 428 | #331 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 405 | #357 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 407 | #348 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 388 | #336 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 381 | #327 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 373 | #322 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 413 | #307 |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,708 | 411 | #305 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 419 | #298 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 423 | #295 |
| 1934 | 5 | #3,753 | 445 | #290 |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,329 | 430 | #292 |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,430 | 386 | #323 |
| 1931 | 8 | #2,897 | 490 | #282 |
| 1930 | 8 | #3,061 | 559 | #265 |
| 1929 | 5 | #4,054 | 510 | #288 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 549 | #279 |
| 1927 | 7 | #3,503 | 607 | #267 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 606 | #272 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 661 | #258 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 662 | #256 |
| 1923 | 6 | #3,884 | 662 | #250 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 679 | #253 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 690 | #254 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 726 | #242 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 711 | #237 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 791 | #224 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 839 | #209 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 810 | #214 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 853 | #195 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 692 | #193 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 532 | #200 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 519 | #188 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 410 | #178 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 402 | #169 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 324 | #185 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 351 | #168 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 314 | #178 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 289 | #176 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 270 | #185 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 293 | #170 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 278 | #175 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 285 | #167 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 251 | #174 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 316 | #173 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 231 | #183 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 265 | #174 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 260 | #171 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 258 | #171 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 273 | #158 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 254 | #162 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 219 | #169 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 222 | #167 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 187 | #177 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 204 | #169 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 167 | #176 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 196 | #157 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 154 | #160 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 147 | #159 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 153 | #148 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 122 | #159 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 101 | #166 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 126 | #141 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 107 | #146 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 90 | #152 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Celia reached #2,708 in 1937. As a girl name, it reached #141 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Celia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.