Is Carver a boy or girl name?
Carver is mostly a boy name in the US. In 2024, 11 girls and 122 boys were named Carver, so 8.3% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 2.7% of the 3,128 US babies named Carver were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,478
- Girl rank, 2024
- #9,027
- Babies named Carver since 1912
- 3,128
- Most popular year
- 2018
- 153 babies
Boys and girls named Carver, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 22 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 49 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 64 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 142 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 72 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 48 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 31 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 38 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 171 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 577 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,208 | 42 | 3.4% |
| 2020s | 620 | 44 | 6.6% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 122 | #1,478 | 11 | #9,027 |
| 2023 | 127 | #1,432 | 9 | #10,464 |
| 2022 | 121 | #1,496 | 9 | #10,548 |
| 2021 | 130 | #1,408 | 5 | #15,720 |
| 2020 | 120 | #1,436 | 10 | #9,696 |
| 2019 | 125 | #1,407 | 7 | #12,703 |
| 2018 | 143 | #1,284 | 10 | #9,967 |
| 2017 | 139 | #1,301 | 8 | #11,864 |
| 2016 | 140 | #1,296 | 9 | #11,060 |
| 2015 | 141 | #1,272 | 8 | #12,055 |
| 2014 | 121 | #1,398 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 109 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 102 | #1,552 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 91 | #1,658 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 97 | #1,614 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 89 | #1,732 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 69 | #2,029 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 71 | #1,981 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 59 | #2,183 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 65 | #1,947 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 63 | #1,937 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 48 | #2,242 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 52 | #2,069 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 38 | #2,531 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 23 | #3,555 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 32 | #2,672 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 28 | #2,866 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 18 | #3,758 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 12 | #4,917 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 18 | #3,575 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 16 | #3,933 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 12 | #4,744 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 15 | #3,943 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 9 | #5,574 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 11 | #4,708 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 6 | #7,083 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 7 | #5,848 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 5 | #7,103 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 7 | #5,420 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 7 | #5,047 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 6 | #5,738 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 5 | #6,182 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 5 | #5,966 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 7 | #4,505 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,088 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 9 | #3,311 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 8 | #3,143 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 8 | #3,025 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 6 | #3,591 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 8 | #3,087 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 7 | #3,350 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 11 | #2,571 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,069 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 5 | #4,035 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 10 | #2,651 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 7 | #3,239 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 7 | #3,206 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 11 | #2,413 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 9 | #2,700 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 11 | #2,389 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 7 | #3,069 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 8 | #2,825 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 14 | #2,043 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 12 | #2,263 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 10 | #2,420 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 21 | #1,452 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 16 | #1,749 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 22 | #1,492 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 13 | #2,054 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 10 | #2,365 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 16 | #1,743 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 13 | #1,971 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 7 | #2,909 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,706 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 7 | #2,904 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 5 | #3,728 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 8 | #2,776 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 9 | #2,573 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 7 | #3,138 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,611 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 5 | #4,243 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 9 | #2,947 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,295 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 6 | #3,943 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 6 | #3,928 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 6 | #3,939 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 6 | #3,891 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 6 | #3,800 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 5 | #3,995 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 6 | #2,970 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,608 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Carver reached #1,272 in 2015. As a girl name, it reached #9,027 in 2024. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Carver
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.