Is Casimir a boy or girl name?
Casimir is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 58 boys were named Casimir, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 5,174 US babies named Casimir were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,393
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Casimir since 1894
- 5,174
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 220 babies
Boys and girls named Casimir, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 31 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 111 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,277 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,404 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 546 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 325 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 252 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 133 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 99 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 132 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 137 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 200 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 284 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 243 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 58 | #2,393 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 58 | #2,363 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 58 | #2,412 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 40 | #3,028 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 29 | #3,660 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 29 | #3,731 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 31 | #3,543 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 24 | #4,243 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 29 | #3,700 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 34 | #3,307 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 31 | #3,466 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 37 | #3,009 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 23 | #4,273 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 22 | #4,388 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 24 | #4,128 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 22 | #4,454 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 28 | #3,753 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 25 | #4,027 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 15 | #5,559 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 23 | #3,960 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 23 | #3,884 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 14 | #5,310 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 23 | #3,685 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 11 | #6,080 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 16 | #4,612 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 13 | #5,074 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 14 | #4,683 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 19 | #3,616 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 10 | #5,593 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 10 | #5,554 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 12 | #4,836 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 13 | #4,477 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 17 | #3,628 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 9 | #5,575 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 20 | #3,073 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 17 | #3,339 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 11 | #4,195 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 11 | #4,005 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 6 | #6,046 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 15 | #3,092 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 17 | #2,715 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 10 | #3,920 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 15 | #2,988 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 14 | #3,050 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 16 | #2,848 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 10 | #3,843 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 9 | #3,899 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 13 | #3,065 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 9 | #3,756 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 5 | #5,582 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 12 | #2,975 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 10 | #3,262 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 10 | #3,190 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 10 | #3,180 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 11 | #2,915 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 10 | #2,891 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 18 | #1,900 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 11 | #2,494 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 7 | #3,283 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 15 | #2,097 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 12 | #2,433 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 16 | #2,050 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 11 | #2,529 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 17 | #2,001 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 16 | #2,051 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 13 | #2,315 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 22 | #1,684 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 15 | #2,105 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 18 | #1,895 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 24 | #1,574 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 30 | #1,386 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 35 | #1,262 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 31 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 29 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 35 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 29 | #1,349 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 30 | #1,326 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 23 | #1,562 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 27 | #1,358 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 38 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 29 | #1,237 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 37 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 44 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 32 | #1,171 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 36 | #1,093 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 31 | #1,172 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 42 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 42 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 39 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 46 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 51 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 74 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 56 | #855 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 72 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 93 | #635 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 88 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 98 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 104 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 114 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 123 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 163 | #485 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 152 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 168 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 188 | #449 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 206 | #413 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 220 | #395 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 179 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 205 | #393 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 181 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 178 | #403 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 106 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 95 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 67 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 29 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 17 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 16 | #686 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 24 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 12 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 13 | #682 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 12 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,085 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 6 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 8 | #874 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 7 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 7 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 7 | #872 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 5 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 8 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 6 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 5 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Casimir reached #393 in 1917. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Casimir
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.