Is Ceola a boy or girl name?
Ceola was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99% of the 2,185 US babies named Ceola were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ceola since 1890
- 2,185
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 75 babies
Boys and girls named Ceola, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 30 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 150 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 406 | 100% |
| 1920s | 10 | 539 | 98.2% |
| 1930s | 11 | 417 | 97.4% |
| 1940s | 0 | 287 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 207 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 88 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,110 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,468 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,311 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,841 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,163 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,701 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,882 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,543 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,666 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,831 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,577 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,976 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,377 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,997 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,871 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,493 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,733 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,343 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,755 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,245 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,274 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,586 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,960 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,669 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,863 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,663 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,397 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,078 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,751 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,426 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,500 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,447 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,599 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,648 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,144 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,236 |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,202 | 40 | #1,117 |
| 1935 | 5 | #3,732 | 35 | #1,205 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 49 | #982 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,000 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 53 | #971 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,023 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,052 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,176 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 56 | #994 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 59 | #990 |
| 1926 | 5 | #4,300 | 48 | #1,083 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,010 |
| 1924 | 5 | #4,453 | 70 | #907 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,029 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 65 | #907 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,047 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,211 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 57 | #934 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,020 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,243 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 65 | #841 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 49 | #947 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,007 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 32 | #950 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 38 | #811 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 21 | #961 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 25 | #861 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 25 | #816 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,051 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 19 | #875 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 21 | #798 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 16 | #934 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,182 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 14 | #934 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,236 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,242 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,059 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,643 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,186 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,450 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,520 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,363 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ceola reached #3,202 in 1936. As a girl name, it reached #798 in 1906. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.