Is Connor a boy or girl name?
Connor is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 23 girls and 2,606 boys were named Connor, so 0.9% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 234,024 US babies named Connor were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #136
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,463
- Babies named Connor since 1913
- 234,024
- Most popular year
- 2004
- 10,116 babies
Boys and girls named Connor, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 31 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 47 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 23 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 50 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 39 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 241 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 3,317 | 41 | 1.2% |
| 1990s | 57,392 | 998 | 1.7% |
| 2000s | 85,983 | 373 | 0.4% |
| 2010s | 68,263 | 195 | 0.3% |
| 2020s | 16,852 | 95 | 0.6% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,606 | #136 | 23 | #5,463 |
| 2023 | 2,859 | #126 | 23 | #5,423 |
| 2022 | 3,210 | #118 | 18 | #6,506 |
| 2021 | 3,764 | #98 | 16 | #7,029 |
| 2020 | 4,413 | #78 | 15 | #7,295 |
| 2019 | 5,160 | #68 | 29 | #4,677 |
| 2018 | 6,086 | #58 | 25 | #5,197 |
| 2017 | 6,421 | #56 | 23 | #5,549 |
| 2016 | 7,037 | #54 | 23 | #5,663 |
| 2015 | 6,769 | #55 | 22 | #5,871 |
| 2014 | 7,231 | #52 | 27 | #5,054 |
| 2013 | 7,116 | #56 | 9 | #11,220 |
| 2012 | 6,982 | #59 | 13 | #8,742 |
| 2011 | 7,410 | #54 | 11 | #9,875 |
| 2010 | 8,051 | #49 | 13 | #8,829 |
| 2009 | 8,101 | #52 | 18 | #7,126 |
| 2008 | 7,816 | #57 | 16 | #7,831 |
| 2007 | 8,330 | #55 | 18 | #7,152 |
| 2006 | 8,676 | #53 | 31 | #4,603 |
| 2005 | 9,321 | #48 | 29 | #4,603 |
| 2004 | 10,049 | #38 | 67 | #2,511 |
| 2003 | 9,670 | #43 | 40 | #3,544 |
| 2002 | 8,409 | #47 | 43 | #3,256 |
| 2001 | 8,082 | #49 | 48 | #2,971 |
| 2000 | 7,529 | #50 | 63 | #2,433 |
| 1999 | 7,597 | #48 | 75 | #2,058 |
| 1998 | 7,906 | #47 | 93 | #1,712 |
| 1997 | 7,140 | #52 | 133 | #1,306 |
| 1996 | 6,911 | #54 | 126 | #1,344 |
| 1995 | 6,619 | #55 | 123 | #1,340 |
| 1994 | 6,318 | #59 | 131 | #1,295 |
| 1993 | 6,453 | #57 | 122 | #1,354 |
| 1992 | 4,609 | #80 | 134 | #1,276 |
| 1991 | 2,462 | #133 | 54 | #2,361 |
| 1990 | 1,377 | #221 | 7 | #10,445 |
| 1989 | 936 | #266 | 15 | #5,609 |
| 1988 | 785 | #294 | 7 | #9,474 |
| 1987 | 584 | #342 | 8 | #8,153 |
| 1986 | 276 | #536 | 5 | #11,294 |
| 1985 | 177 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 157 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 141 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 89 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 95 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 77 | #1,031 | 6 | #9,321 |
| 1979 | 64 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 57 | #1,177 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 25 | #1,956 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 18 | #2,437 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 16 | #2,554 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 11 | #3,172 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 7 | #4,142 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 17 | #2,262 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 17 | #2,300 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 9 | #3,323 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 15 | #2,230 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 11 | #2,598 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 7 | #3,302 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 9 | #2,810 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 7 | #3,294 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 10 | #2,695 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 5 | #4,151 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 5 | #4,157 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 5 | #4,181 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 10 | #2,718 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 8 | #3,065 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 9 | #2,803 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 5 | #3,927 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 5 | #3,914 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 6 | #3,415 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 6 | #3,388 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 9 | #2,645 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 8 | #2,823 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 5 | #3,825 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 6 | #3,239 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 5 | #3,407 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 6 | #3,283 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 6 | #3,285 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,597 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,586 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 7 | #2,918 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 6 | #3,235 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,108 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 6 | #3,857 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 9 | #3,068 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 7 | #3,531 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 6 | #3,942 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 9 | #3,026 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 10 | #2,807 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,282 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,097 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 6 | #3,582 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 8 | #2,870 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 7 | #2,315 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Connor reached #38 in 2004. As a girl name, it reached #1,276 in 1992. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Connor
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.