Is Conner a boy or girl name?
Conner is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 9 girls and 320 boys were named Conner, so 2.7% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1.5% of the 56,968 US babies named Conner were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #783
- Girl rank, 2024
- #10,429
- Babies named Conner since 1915
- 56,968
- Most popular year
- 2005
- 3,229 babies
Boys and girls named Conner, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 39 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 48 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 50 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 44 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 35 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 36 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 40 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 691 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 12,632 | 540 | 4.1% |
| 2000s | 24,930 | 186 | 0.7% |
| 2010s | 15,204 | 90 | 0.6% |
| 2020s | 2,362 | 41 | 1.7% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 320 | #783 | 9 | #10,429 |
| 2023 | 355 | #742 | 8 | #11,400 |
| 2022 | 440 | #633 | 9 | #10,568 |
| 2021 | 571 | #513 | 8 | #11,342 |
| 2020 | 676 | #438 | 7 | #12,422 |
| 2019 | 848 | #373 | 10 | #9,891 |
| 2018 | 909 | #365 | 9 | #10,752 |
| 2017 | 1,022 | #335 | 10 | #10,129 |
| 2016 | 1,147 | #310 | 12 | #9,012 |
| 2015 | 1,415 | #256 | 8 | #12,091 |
| 2014 | 1,639 | #228 | 8 | #12,195 |
| 2013 | 1,703 | #218 | 9 | #11,219 |
| 2012 | 1,908 | #202 | 11 | #9,873 |
| 2011 | 2,173 | #175 | 7 | #13,682 |
| 2010 | 2,440 | #158 | 6 | #15,402 |
| 2009 | 2,498 | #156 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 2,421 | #162 | 11 | #10,237 |
| 2007 | 2,631 | #159 | 5 | #18,242 |
| 2006 | 2,851 | #144 | 15 | #7,965 |
| 2005 | 3,207 | #127 | 22 | #5,639 |
| 2004 | 3,005 | #134 | 49 | #3,138 |
| 2003 | 2,677 | #153 | 17 | #6,659 |
| 2002 | 1,927 | #197 | 15 | #7,133 |
| 2001 | 1,833 | #199 | 23 | #5,048 |
| 2000 | 1,880 | #191 | 29 | #4,214 |
| 1999 | 1,882 | #185 | 50 | #2,748 |
| 1998 | 1,776 | #192 | 58 | #2,405 |
| 1997 | 1,727 | #190 | 68 | #2,075 |
| 1996 | 1,560 | #199 | 74 | #1,932 |
| 1995 | 1,460 | #204 | 66 | #2,056 |
| 1994 | 1,292 | #226 | 74 | #1,910 |
| 1993 | 1,292 | #228 | 67 | #2,048 |
| 1992 | 912 | #296 | 52 | #2,465 |
| 1991 | 468 | #457 | 25 | #4,087 |
| 1990 | 263 | #625 | 6 | #11,717 |
| 1989 | 190 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 175 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 135 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 40 | #1,621 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 44 | #1,507 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 33 | #1,727 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 27 | #1,966 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 11 | #3,737 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 24 | #2,146 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 12 | #3,454 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 14 | #3,037 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 15 | #2,816 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 5 | #5,760 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 6 | #4,488 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 7 | #3,660 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 6 | #3,763 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 6 | #3,630 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 6 | #3,599 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 6 | #3,716 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 5 | #4,141 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,097 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 7 | #3,298 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 8 | #2,998 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 10 | #2,570 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 5 | #3,813 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 5 | #3,781 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 5 | #3,824 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 7 | #2,794 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 7 | #2,915 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 6 | #3,282 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 6 | #3,284 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 8 | #2,695 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,717 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 5 | #3,758 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 6 | #3,357 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,065 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,452 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 9 | #2,693 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 9 | #2,817 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 8 | #3,037 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,187 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,331 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 9 | #2,986 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 6 | #3,941 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 6 | #3,953 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 6 | #3,914 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 11 | #2,536 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 11 | #2,459 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 8 | #2,970 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 9 | #2,667 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Conner reached #127 in 2005. As a girl name, it reached #1,910 in 1994. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Conner
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.