Is Corliss a boy or girl name?
Corliss was mostly a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 89.3% of the 3,192 US babies named Corliss were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Corliss since 1913
- 3,192
- Most popular year
- 1946
- 187 babies
Boys and girls named Corliss, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 72 | 6 | 7.7% |
| 1920s | 108 | 159 | 59.6% |
| 1930s | 71 | 82 | 53.6% |
| 1940s | 24 | 735 | 96.8% |
| 1950s | 17 | 1,116 | 98.5% |
| 1960s | 7 | 442 | 98.4% |
| 1970s | 0 | 185 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 79 | 100% |
| 1990s | 44 | 40 | 47.6% |
| 2000s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,314 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,648 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 5 | #9,265 | 6 | #12,168 |
| 1995 | 17 | #3,724 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 22 | #3,128 | 5 | #13,895 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 9 | #8,878 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,727 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,445 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,924 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,649 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,669 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,904 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,735 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,524 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,446 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,421 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,771 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,151 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,723 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,634 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,192 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,911 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,890 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,139 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,561 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,607 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,170 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,408 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,804 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,223 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,362 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,860 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,688 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,491 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,432 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,432 |
| 1960 | 7 | #3,398 | 75 | #1,268 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,184 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,351 |
| 1957 | 6 | #3,640 | 66 | #1,306 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 129 | #878 |
| 1955 | 6 | #3,569 | 137 | #827 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 108 | #929 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 113 | #887 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 145 | #736 |
| 1951 | 5 | #3,818 | 139 | #745 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 137 | #732 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,007 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 123 | #773 |
| 1947 | 6 | #3,438 | 142 | #711 |
| 1946 | 5 | #3,618 | 182 | #591 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 80 | #843 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 70 | #918 |
| 1943 | 8 | #2,775 | 44 | #1,216 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,052 |
| 1940 | 5 | #3,551 | 8 | #3,271 |
| 1939 | 7 | #2,881 | 5 | #4,376 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,521 |
| 1937 | 13 | #2,014 | 10 | #2,772 |
| 1936 | 7 | #2,925 | 5 | #4,316 |
| 1935 | 9 | #2,569 | 8 | #3,208 |
| 1934 | 5 | #3,781 | 10 | #2,777 |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,068 | 8 | #3,168 |
| 1932 | 11 | #2,351 | 13 | #2,390 |
| 1931 | 5 | #3,881 | 9 | #3,024 |
| 1930 | 7 | #3,354 | 7 | #3,730 |
| 1929 | 9 | #2,807 | 6 | #4,171 |
| 1928 | 10 | #2,694 | 10 | #2,989 |
| 1927 | 10 | #2,739 | 16 | #2,277 |
| 1926 | 7 | #3,452 | 24 | #1,733 |
| 1925 | 7 | #3,473 | 15 | #2,397 |
| 1924 | 18 | #1,909 | 30 | #1,538 |
| 1923 | 15 | #2,143 | 25 | #1,688 |
| 1922 | 9 | #3,063 | 21 | #1,909 |
| 1921 | 11 | #2,663 | 6 | #4,583 |
| 1920 | 12 | #2,490 | 6 | #4,502 |
| 1919 | 9 | #2,921 | 6 | #4,362 |
| 1918 | 9 | #2,921 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 14 | #2,108 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 13 | #2,172 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 8 | #2,873 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 10 | #2,137 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 9 | #1,978 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Corliss reached #1,909 in 1924. As a girl name, it reached #591 in 1946. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Corliss
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.