Is Curtiss a boy or girl name?
Curtiss was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 5,074 US babies named Curtiss were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #12,666
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Curtiss since 1896
- 5,074
- Most popular year
- 1959
- 126 babies
Boys and girls named Curtiss, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 236 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 475 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 586 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 781 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 947 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 792 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 463 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 379 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 232 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 94 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 57 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | #12,666 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 5 | #12,420 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 6 | #11,055 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 5 | #12,678 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,158 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 8 | #8,959 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 7 | #9,916 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 6 | #11,108 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 14 | #6,102 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 13 | #6,504 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 11 | #7,301 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 6 | #10,937 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 7 | #9,311 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 10 | #7,072 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 10 | #6,825 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 13 | #5,461 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 11 | #6,098 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 13 | #5,343 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 18 | #4,013 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 18 | #3,873 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 18 | #3,768 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 21 | #3,314 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 12 | #4,852 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 26 | #2,783 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 39 | #2,059 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 16 | #3,783 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 32 | #2,240 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 32 | #2,226 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 46 | #1,686 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 40 | #1,738 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 37 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 32 | #1,882 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 37 | #1,678 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 34 | #1,699 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 30 | #1,833 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 50 | #1,323 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 35 | #1,667 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 38 | #1,575 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 45 | #1,394 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 41 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 39 | #1,478 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 34 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 42 | #1,346 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 35 | #1,476 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 47 | #1,205 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 47 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 60 | #1,052 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 73 | #934 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 79 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 59 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 61 | #926 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 58 | #951 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 51 | #1,033 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 77 | #870 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 111 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 99 | #769 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 108 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 89 | #809 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 126 | #681 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 93 | #771 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 104 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 102 | #728 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 109 | #700 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 81 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 98 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 75 | #809 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 88 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 71 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 86 | #742 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 86 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 73 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 79 | #739 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 72 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 72 | #731 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 91 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 82 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 77 | #702 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 63 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 60 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 61 | #786 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 62 | #781 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 53 | #835 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 74 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 53 | #864 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 51 | #871 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 63 | #804 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 58 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 51 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 71 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 51 | #954 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 55 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 41 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 44 | #1,046 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 40 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 51 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 44 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 36 | #1,206 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 42 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 37 | #1,146 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 35 | #1,178 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 33 | #1,181 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 38 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 27 | #1,273 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 21 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 18 | #1,219 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 14 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,797 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,226 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,387 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 6 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Curtiss reached #674 in 1943. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Curtiss
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.