Is Deana a boy or girl name?
Deana is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 13 girls and 0 boys were named Deana, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 23,463 US babies named Deana were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #8,042
- Babies named Deana since 1905
- 23,463
- Most popular year
- 1970
- 1,363 babies
Boys and girls named Deana, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 68 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 145 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 279 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 859 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 2,407 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 6,792 | 100% |
| 1970s | 14 | 7,074 | 99.8% |
| 1980s | 0 | 2,775 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,665 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 986 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 324 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 70 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,042 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,504 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,729 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,349 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,132 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,033 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,872 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,555 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,182 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,334 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,927 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,792 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,982 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,678 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,373 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,430 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 91 | #2,190 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,164 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 86 | #2,231 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 85 | #2,167 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,929 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,834 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,713 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,654 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,359 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,409 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 158 | #1,180 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 169 | #1,113 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,216 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 154 | #1,140 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 155 | #1,148 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,089 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 182 | #1,026 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 191 | #984 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 219 | #885 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 179 | #972 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 231 | #800 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 217 | #807 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 243 | #732 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 271 | #668 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 305 | #591 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 323 | #563 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 297 | #603 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 355 | #531 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 354 | #534 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 425 | #478 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 423 | #465 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 459 | #446 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 497 | #404 |
| 1975 | 8 | #4,040 | 616 | #351 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 664 | #332 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 754 | #309 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 855 | #295 |
| 1971 | 6 | #4,518 | 1,018 | #281 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 1,363 | #232 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 1,193 | #248 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 1,049 | #256 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 783 | #309 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 624 | #363 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 536 | #401 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 591 | #400 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 553 | #409 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 563 | #409 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 469 | #451 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 431 | #468 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 412 | #479 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 347 | #521 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 297 | #556 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 295 | #544 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 264 | #559 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 204 | #644 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 180 | #669 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 167 | #690 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 124 | #799 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 117 | #806 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 99 | #887 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 123 | #774 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 114 | #820 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 103 | #816 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 69 | #904 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 79 | #857 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 77 | #889 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 78 | #874 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 54 | #993 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 63 | #907 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 56 | #941 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 63 | #892 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,103 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,703 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,733 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,017 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,665 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,395 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,611 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,037 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,025 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,496 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,114 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,601 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,307 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,555 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,195 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,647 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,142 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,951 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,287 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,302 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,736 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,030 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,949 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,746 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,695 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,007 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Deana reached #4,040 in 1975. As a girl name, it reached #232 in 1970. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Deana
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.